Africa Features
Clooney brings Hollywood punch to Darfur campaign
By Tony Czuczka Apr 28, 2006, 5:49 GMT
Washington - George Clooney admits he is a latecomer to humanitarian causes, but the Hollywood heart-throb is making up for it by campaigning for an end to three years of killing in Darfur.
The Oscar-winning actor and director just spent eight days in Sudan and neighbouring Chad, talking to Darfur victims about massacres of family members, rapes and life in refugee camps.
Part of a growing campaign for US President George W Bush to take bolder action on Darfur, the trip was timed to highlight Sunday's big 'Rally to Stop Genocide' in Washington, which Clooney plans to attend.
A political liberal who usually has few kind words for Bush, Clooney was earnest and low-key as he explained his activism Thursday to a packed room of reporters two blocks from the White House.
'This is not a political issue,' he said. 'There is only right and wrong. It is the first genocide of the 21st century.'
Clooney, 44, travelled to the region with his journalist father and a cameraman to record testimony from the victims of Darfur, where Arab militias backed by the Sudanese government have been killing, raping, pillaging and driving residents from their homes.
He recalled a 'waif' of a woman who asked him through a translator when he would be back.
'We told the translator to say, 'Soon.' She laughed and said, 'They have all said that,'' he said.
Clooney, whose film Good Night, And Good Luck championed press freedom, said US media could help by reporting more on Darfur.
'I was late to the game in Africa in many ways,' he said. 'My job is to keep this on the front burner as often as possible. (...) I know it's not sexy.'
Just because the US government is tied down in places like Iraq is no excuse for lagging action to protect people in Darfur, Clooney said, recalling the genocide in Rwanda a decade ago.
'Of course we're slow to act. We always are,' he said.
More than 180,000 civilians have been killed in Darfur, according to UN estimates, but relief groups put the figure higher. At least 2 million people have been displaced, sending a recent wave of political unrest across neighbouring Chad.
Bush has called the events in Darfur 'genocide.' On Thursday, shortly after Clooney's high-profile event, Bush authorized the freezing of assets of four Sudanese leaders accused of involvement in war crimes. The order could be extended to other suspects.
Clooney called for a more forceful response, urging Bush to invest political capital in rallying international support for a tougher, UN-led peace force or a NATO role in Darfur.
Two US senators flanking Clooney - Sam Brownback of Bush's Republicans and opposition Democrat Barack Obama - broadly agreed.
Brownback praised Clooney for getting involved. 'You could just sit at home,' he said, drawing a laugh from Clooney.
© 2006 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Africa
- 1. Several dead in car bombing in northern Nigeria
- 2. Mogadishu blast kills seven, including sports chiefs
- 3. Seven dead in Mogadishu suicide bomb attack
- 4. ANC suspends Youth League leader with immediate effect
- 5. Police arrest Uganda's opposition leader and others at protest march
Older Talkback
page: 1
Goerge Clooney? Who cares.
Only okay to save the people that Hollywood say's so. How is this any different only on a smaller scale. Complete double standard.
One thing that activists on the left and right have in common is their phony concern for what is going on in the Sudan. Both groups claim that the Arab controlled government is ethinically cleansing black Africans. If there was real concern in what is going on in Sudan, there would be a discussion about all the parties involved in the atrocities in the Sudan. I suggest you read the article 'Tactical Use of Genocide in Sudan and the Five Lakes Region' by John Bart Gerald. (which can be searched for at http://globalresearch.ca) You might want to read also '5 truths about Darfur' by Emily Wax which can be found on the washington post website (http://www.washingtonpost.com)
A good question that should be discussed among Jews, Christians, Muslims, and even secular humanists is:
If we want to see atrocities committed by other governments stopped, shouldn't we set the example by stopping atrocites committed by our own government, which we benefit from?
In Liberia , Sierre Leone, and the Congo, millions have died while The United States, Israel, and European Countries have gained great wealth from diamonds, minerals, and other natural resources from these countries. THe United States has made billions of dollars selling weapons to various African countries. Child slaves in West Africa pick cocoa that is used in making chocalate. Is it okay for genocide and oppression to occur when industrialized countries benefit from it?
Unfortunately, the biased way activists on the right and left have discussed the Sudan makes it clear they don't really care about the people of Sudan and are only using the cause as a political tool.
Zionists have taken up the cause of Sudan because they like to link the Palestinian Arabs with the Sudanese Arabs. Others have taken up this cause so that they don't have to think about the genocide being committed in Iraq.
we are talking about peoples lifes here. it is not a laughing matter. More money and facilities should be spent saving this people's lifes, before this situation gets worse. forget that there africans just remember they are human beings
page: 1


Howard CarverApr 28th, 2006 - 06:53:03
The US is the only force that has enough clout to makea difference. We all know that a year from now the comment will be 'Why wasn't something done sooner'. We need to step up to our responsibilities as a democracy and put some 'boots on the ground'.
Report this comment