Americas News
Kirchner, Correa warned against travelling to Honduras
Jul 2, 2009, 19:20 GMT
Tegucigalpa, Honduras/Buenos Aires - Honduras' interim leadership has warned the presidents of Argentina and Ecuador against travelling to the Central American country with ousted President Manuel Zelaya.
Interim president Roberto Micheletti warned presidents Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner of Argentina and Rafael Correa of Ecuador against travelling to Honduras.
'I will hold Cristina Kirchner and Correa accountable for whatever happens in the country,' Micheletti said in an interview published Thursday in conservative Argentine daily La Nacion.
Zelaya was arrested and exiled to Costa Rica Sunday in a coup ordered by the country's Supreme Court, reportedly to stop him from attempting to change the constitution and seek a second term.
Fernandez de Kirchner and Correa were planning to accompany Zelaya back to Tegucigalpa after the 72-hour ultimatum that the Organization of American States (OAS) gave Honduras to reinstate the democratically-elected president expires Saturday.
Micheletti has said that Zelaya would be arrested on his return. He warned that the ousted president's intention to come back to Honduras with a high-profile foreign escort was 'a big mistake.'
'If violence breaks out in case Zelaya returns, I am going to be worried about the presidents who may come over,' Micheletti said.
He expressed concern over the withdrawal of ambassadors from many nations, including all members of the European Union, but noted that Israel and Taiwan have already recognized his government and that 'international backing will grow.'

COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Americas
- 1. Mexico drug lord Arellano gets 25 years in US prison
- 2. Drug violence not just Mexican problem, North American leaders say
- 3. Mexico drug lord Arellano sentenced to 25 years in US prison
- 4. Pope Cuba Visit Pictures
- 5. Pope thanks Mexico for "unforgettable experiences"
Older Talkback
page: 1
Good,continue to be appalled if you really must but please refrain from injecting your own bias into reality .What the (ex) president proposed was a referendum as foreseen in the constitution of 1982 ,the one you just sanctified ,in order to obtain a second mandate.THis procedure is legal ,if thesupreme court opposes it ,don't you think they simply fear the results rather than the principle (which is part of the constitution ).
Honduras is the country for which the term 'banana republic ' was first used.Allowing military coups to take place is nothing but confiming this .
Perhaps what will happen is something similar as whar happened in Venezeuela when Chavez was ousted by a military coup:the population will raise in defence of its president .Chavez has always been elected democratically,like him or not .
page: 1

PatrickJul 3rd, 2009 - 04:46:08
I am absolutely appalled at the international reaction to the recent events in Honduras. Mel Zelaya was a corrupt leader who was in process of selling his country to Venezuela. The constitution of Honduras has very specific provisions against exactly the type of actions Mr. Zelaya was undertaking to prolong his tenure in office. Below is an e-mail from a well-respected Honduran attorney. The Honduran PEOPLE have stood up to a corrupt leftist president who violated the law in order to establish himself as a Hugo Chavez style dictator. And the US government side with Chavez and Zelaya and Castro????
Honduras had a vaccine against the autocratic epidemic affecting the region.
All the emails received in response to the newsletter sent yesterday, have encouraged me to write again and clear some of your doubts. Having seen the court files today also forces me to correct a mistake I made yesterday in declaring the constitutional succession of power a coup. The reality is everything was executed in accordance with the Constitution and the Laws of Honduras.
On January 11th of the year 1982, a constituent assembly gave birth to a beautiful Constitution that was vaccinated against the diseases that historically have affected the region. The Honduran Constitution does not allow the reform of articles related to the form of government, the territory, the presidential term, the prohibition on presidential reelection and who can't become President in the subsequent term. It goes further and states that the alternation of the Presidency is mandatory and its violators incur in high treason.
The above is nice but it does not explain by itself how Zelaya was removed from the Presidency legally. Our constitution clearly lays out an impeachment process that must be followed to trial and convict a President that has violated the Law. But our Constitution also includes a single exception to this rule in article 239, which states that the President that violates the principle of alternation of the Presidency or simply proposes its reform, will immediately cease in the exercise of office. In other words, the simple act of proposing the reform removes ispo jure (by operation of law) a President from office. This may sound radical to many, but the truth is it's coherent with the geopolitical reality of Honduras ; and on June 28 of 2009 it proved why.
Zelaya clearly violated the Constitution and incurred in high treason. There is vast evidence that support this, which was used by the Attorney General to get a court order to arrest Manuel Zelaya Rosales; a citizen that deposed himself from office when he committed the highest crime under our Constitution. The different court files and the Honduran Constitution are available through the hyperlinks at the bottom of this newsletter. I urge you to see these documents for yourself.
The political crisis in Honduras will remind the world that the alternation of the Presidency is a sacred democratic principle that assures a government of the people, by the people and for the people. A true democracy imposes limits to those in power to prevent them from becoming dictators. It's based on the fundamental concept, that no President is good enough to stay in power, to justify the risk of a bad President staying in power.
Sincerely,
Luis Bueso
Report this comment