Americas News
Tough task ahead for peacemaker Arias in Honduran talks
Jul 8, 2009, 16:57 GMT
San Jose - It will be a challenge for Costa Rican President Oscar Arias to mediate discussions between two Honduran rivals on Thursday, with both willing to talk but reluctant to set aside their demands.
Ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya and former Honduran Congress speaker Roberto Micheletti - the man designated to head the government after Zelaya was ousted in a military coup June 28 - were expected to arrive in Costa Rican capital San Jose Wednesday, ahead of formal talks with Arias Thursday.
Both have accepted Arias' offer to lead mediation efforts backed by the United States, but neither is ready to set aside individual demands.
'I am not going to negotiate. I am not going to betray my principles or those of my people,' Zelaya said Tuesday in Washington. 'There are things that are non-negotiable. For example, the restoration of the presidential system.'
For Zelaya, Arias' main task is planning 'the exit of the coup perpetrators from the country.'
Micheletti said in Honduran capital Tegucigalpa that he was willing to talk to Arias, who he said had 'an unblemished behaviour record and is a man of great credibility at the global level.'
'We have the greatest interest for there to be peace and calm in our country, that is our intention when we sit down to negotiate,' Micheletti said.
But he added that Zelaya's return to Honduras was non-negotiable 'unless it is to turn himself in to justice officials.' Micheletti has repeatedly said that Zelaya would be arrested as soon as he sets foot on Honduran territory.
Micheletti also reacted to the suggestion by the head of the Honduran Supreme Court that Zelaya - who is being charged with treason, abuse of authority and corruption - be granted amnesty by Congress.
'An amnesty can be political, but it cannot deal with legal issues or with crimes that were committed. That cannot be negotiated under any circumstance, with anybody,' Micheletti said.
US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who met with Zelaya in Washington Tuesday, said Arias' role as current president of the Central American Association made him the 'natural person' to take on the mediating effort.
The Social Democrat Arias, 68, is serving a second stint as Costa Rican president, after a first term from 1986 to 1990. He received a Nobel Peace Prize in 1987 for his effort to end the civil war in El Salvador.
Arias knows that his latest mediation task will not be easy. 'I do not know how long the meetings are going to last. However, experience tells us that you need to be patient to generate trust between the parties,' he said.

COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Americas
- 1. Mexico drug lord Arellano gets 25 years in US prison
- 2. Drug violence not just Mexican problem, North American leaders say
- 3. Mexico drug lord Arellano sentenced to 25 years in US prison
- 4. Pope Cuba Visit Pictures
- 5. Pope thanks Mexico for "unforgettable experiences"
Older Talkback
page: 1
page: 1

brainfoodJul 8th, 2009 - 19:42:07
Interestingly, the Honduran Constitution of 1982 does provide for loss of citizenship for those who “incite, promote or aid in the continuation or re-election of the President” (article 42):
ARTICULO 42.- La calidad de ciudadano se pierde:
5. Por incitar, promover o apoyar el continuismo o la reelección del Presidente de la República; y,
Further, Article 239 indicates that anyone who has held the office of chief executive cannot be president or vice president and anyone who proposes reform to that prohibition can be barred from holding public office for ten years:
ARTICULO 239.- El ciudadano que haya desempeñado la titularidad del Poder Ejecutivo no podrá ser Presidente o Vicepresidente de la República.
El que quebrante esta disposición o proponga su reforma, así como aquellos que lo apoyen directa o indirectamente, cesarán de inmediato en el desempeño de sus respectivos cargos y quedarán inhabilitados por diez (10) años para el ejercicio de toda función pública.
My educated guess on that provision is that it is aimed move at banning past military dictators from pursuing the office than it is a stricture contra re-election, per se.
Additionally, Article 374 bars any amendments regarding the length of the presidential term (amongst other things:
ARTICULO 374.- No podrán reformarse, en ningún caso, el artículo anterior, el presente artículo, los artículos constitucionales que se refieren a la forma de gobierno, al territorio nacional, al período presidencial, a la prohibición para ser nuevamente Presidente de la República, el ciudadano que lo haya desempeñado bajo cualquier título y el referente a quienes no pueden ser Presidentes de la República por el período subsiguiente.
As such, it is pretty clear why the Supreme Court of Justice ruled against Zelaya’s plebiscite proposal in the first place. It also means that if the vote had been allowed to happen it would have had no legal standing.
Report this comment