Americas News
Talks on aimed at resolving Honduran crisis begin (1st Lead)
Jul 9, 2009, 19:40 GMT
San Jose - Meetings aimed at ending the political crisis in Honduras began Thursday at the home of Costa Rican President Oscar Arias.
Arias, who has taken on the role of mediator, hosted ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya and his challenger Roberto Micheletti in separate meetings.
Zelaya arrived first at Arias' home in the Rohrmoser neighbourhood of San Jose and met with him for over an hour. Arias then met separately with Micheletti. The three were later to discuss the crisis together.
Micheletti, the former Honduran Congress speaker who was designated to head the government set up after the June 28 coup that ousted Zelaya, remained at San Jose airport for more than an hour, demanding 'security guarantees,' and refused to leave until these were met.
Micheletti said he was optimistic that a way out of the ongoing Honduran political crisis could be found.
'I have faith that there can be a solution,' Micheletti said.
Zelaya was less conciliatory when he arrived in San Jose late Wednesday. 'He is a criminal who has beaten down our people and the rights of our democracy,' Zelaya said Wednesday night of Micheletti.
Zelaya, whose ouster was condemned by the international community, stressed that he had not come to San Jose for negotiations on his reinstatement as president.
'I want to clarify that our presence here is not due to any negotiation,' he said. 'It's as if you are invited to negotiate with a criminal who raped your family.'
In Washington, Jose Miguel Insulza, secretary general of the Organization of American States (OAS), reiterated Thursday his support for Zelaya. He said Micheletti should 'accept the return of the constitutional president,' in line with the OAS resolution that suspended Honduras from membership until Zelaya was reinstated.
'In the end we have to get to the return of President Zelaya,' Insulza said. 'Everything else is negotiable.'
The preliminary talks involving Arias, who was awarded the 1987 Nobel Peace Prize for his role in bringing peace to Central America, were set to end Friday.
'The news will be that there was no chance for an agreement, that there was an agreement or that they agreed to meet again. But what is not going to happen is that they spend four or five days talking,' Insulza said.
Following any deal, the OAS will have to decide whether to lift its suspension of Honduras, he said.

COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Americas
- 1. Mexico drug lord Arellano gets 25 years in US prison
- 2. Drug violence not just Mexican problem, North American leaders say
- 3. Mexico drug lord Arellano sentenced to 25 years in US prison
- 4. Pope Cuba Visit Pictures
- 5. Pope thanks Mexico for "unforgettable experiences"
Older Talkback
page: 1
page: 1

brainfoodJul 9th, 2009 - 21:19:00
Interestingly, the Honduran Constitution of 1982 does provide for loss of citizenship for those who “incite, promote or aid in the continuation or re-election of the President” (article 42):
ARTICULO 42.- La calidad de ciudadano se pierde: 5. Por incitar, promover o apoyar el continuismo o la reelección del Presidente de la República.
Further, Article 239 indicates that anyone who has held the office of chief executive cannot be president or vice president and anyone who proposes reform to that prohibition can be barred from holding public office for ten years: ARTICULO 239.- El ciudadano que haya desempeñado la titularidad del Poder Ejecutivo no podrá ser Presidente o Vicepresidente de la República. El que quebrante esta disposición o proponga su reforma, así como aquellos que lo apoyen directa o indirectamente, cesarán de inmediato en el desempeño de sus respectivos cargos y quedarán inhabilitados por diez años para el ejercicio de toda función pública.
My educated guess on that provision is that it is aimed move at banning past military dictators from pursuing the office than it is a stricture contra re-election, per se.
Additionally, Article 374 bars any amendments regarding the length of the presidential term (amongst other things:
ARTICULO 374.- No podrán reformarse, en ningún caso, el artículo anterior, el presente artículo, los artículos constitucionales que se refieren a la forma de gobierno, al territorio nacional, al período presidencial, a la prohibición para ser nuevamente Presidente de la República, el ciudadano que lo haya desempeñado bajo cualquier título y el referente a quienes no pueden ser Presidentes de la República por el período subsiguiente.
As such, it is pretty clear why the Supreme Court of Justice ruled against Zelaya’s plebiscite proposal in the first place. It also means that if the vote had been allowed to happen it would have had no legal standing.
Report this comment