Asia-Pacific Features
Japan holds on to nuclear power despite accidents
By Lars Nicolaysen Jul 17, 2007, 14:03 GMT
Tokyo - Radioactive material that leaked from two reactors at the world's largest nuclear power plant when an earthquake hit the northern Japanese region of Niigata on Monday has brought atomic safety back into the headlines.
The 6.8-magnitude earthquake, which killed at least nine and injured more than 1,000 people in the region, also damaged the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant and caused contaminated water to spill into the sea.
Even though Japan has seen incidents of similar consequence in the past, the events in Niigata province have called the safety of Japanese nuclear power plants into question.
Once more the public has demanded stricter safety measures. But changes in Japan's nuclear policy are not yet in sight.
The ground motion measured at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant after the quake was apparently significantly more intense than had been taken into account when the plant was constructed.
Newspapers such as the conservative Sankei Shimbun called for a probe into the earthquake resistance of nuclear power plants, while the government told operating company TEPCO not to switch the plant back on until it could vouch for its safety.
The reactions resemble those to earlier incidents.
When two people died of a lethal dose of radiation after an accident at a uranium processing plant in Tokaimura as a result of cost-cutting measures and shoddy work, the government in Tokyo promised to increase nuclear safety.
Nevertheless, there were more accidents.
'For more than 20 years we have been witnessing the failure of state supervision over a nuclear industry which is still unable to sufficiently control itself,' Martin Schulz, an economist at the Fujitsu Research Institute in Tokyo said.
Japan has been relying on a model of private self-monitoring for a long time. But critics complain that safety concerns are often put behind company profits.
The state only ever intervened after major incidents, however without a systematic improvement of state supervision of the nuclear industry, Schulz said.
Out of 55 nuclear power plants across the country only 37 are still on the grid.
Time and again nuclear power plants are being switched off for reviews on public demand after hazardous incidents.
In particular in regions with many nuclear plants the population is resistant, making it difficult for the government to find new locations for the interim and final storage of nuclear waste.
Despite all this, observers think that Japan, which depends on foreign oil supplies, and currently derives one-third of its energy supplies from nuclear energy, will continue to build new nuclear facilities in the next few years, including fast breeder reactors.
With around 290 billion kilowatt hours, Japan is the largest producer of nuclear power after the United States and France.
Until the 2018 tax year Japan is planning to build another 13 nuclear plants, two of which are already under construction.
Asia, like the rest of the world, has recently been witnessing a clear trend towards nuclear power amidst the current oil crisis and the threat of global warming.
Popular protest in Japan, meanwhile, is unlikely to have much success, not least because compared to other Asian countries, Japan considers its nuclear industry as safe - despite hazardous incidents.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Asia-Pacific
- 1. Chinese dissidents hail late democracy activist Fang Lizhi
- 2. China "worried" over planned North Korea rocket launch
- 3. Myanmar's opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi meets Karen rebels
- 4. Chinese schoolboy sells kidney to buy iPad, iPhone
- 5. Myanmar president invites Karen rebels to form party
Older Talkback
page: 1
page: 1

G. R. L. CowanJul 17th, 2007 - 18:05:27
This article fails to report the vital fact that the
'radioactive material' that leaked into the sea
was water that was less radioactive than human flesh.
It leaked from a spent fuel cooling pool.
Spent fuel irradiates the water but does not
make it radioactive, and typically, therefore,
the water is not contaminated by any honest measure.
This case is no exception.
That's a very deceitful omission, no doubt about it.
But the reportage that the Japanese government
is forbidding the plant to restart is believable.
That government takes a large profit,
on the order of $60 per barrel, on imported petroleum,
and uranium's price for the moment appears to be stalled
at about three and one-half dollars per thermal
barrel-equivalent, so shutting down nuclear plants
is a pleasurable activity for Japanese public servants.
The reference to 'public demand' for nuclear shutdowns
and the assertion that 'the population is resistant',
in light of that fact, also appears deceitful, and
'Popular protest in Japan, meanwhile,
is unlikely to have much success' looks like
an acknowledgment that the protest is not, in fact,
popular. The Japanese public would support nuclear energy
if its voice could be heard; it is the government itself
that is of two minds about it. Or more accurately,
one mind and one stomach.
--- G. R. L. Cowan, former hydrogen-energy fan
Report this comment