Nuclear News
Bush: US needs more nuclear power
Jun 21, 2007, 23:22 GMT
Washington - The United States should start building new nuclear power plants by the end of the decade to help cut oil imports and greenhouse gas emissions, President George W Bush said Thursday.
Bush visited a newly restarted civilian reactor at the Browns Ferry plant in the southern state of Alabama to make his case that nuclear power is reliable and clean.
'We need nuclear power to play a greater role in our future,' he said.
Nearly 20 per cent of US electricity is nuclear-generated. As US energy needs grow, experts believe an average of three new plants a year are needed after 2014 to keep that share, the White House said.
'I remind those who share my concern about greenhouse gases that nuclear energy produces no greenhouse gases,' Bush said. 'If you are interested in cleaning up the air, then you ought to be an advocate for nuclear power.'
Bush contrasted the US share of nuclear power to France, which gets about three-quarters of its electricity from nuclear plants, and the European Union's overall 30-per-cent nuclear share.
US utilities have not ordered a new nuclear plant since the 1970s, a hiatus Bush blamed in part on 'constant litigation and overly complex regulations.'
The last new US civilian nuclear reactor went on line in February 1996.
The US 'ought to ... be able to start construction on additional nuclear plants by the end of this decade,' Bush said.
Browns Ferry Unit 1 restarted on May 22 after a 1.8-billion-dollar restoration, ending a 22-year shutdown. First started up in 1973, the reactor went off line in 1985 after a series of problems, including a fire started by a worker who used a candle to check for air leaks.
Since restarting, the 1.2-megawatt reactor at Athens, Alabama, has been idled twice for leaks.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Nuclear
- 1. Global Nuclear Energy Parntership to back peaceful use
- 2. Latvian environmentalists oppose plans for Lithuanian nuclear plant
- 3. Renewed battle on safety at Germany's nuclear plants
- 4. Villagers against Indonesia's plans for nuclear power plant
- 5. Support for sixth Finnish reactor drops: poll
Older Talkback
page: 1
i hate bush.
no one else gets nuclear anything, just the US. we are king. duh
What this contry needs is to develope Hydro power. Locally there are several hydro facilities that have been abandoned or removed. Redevelopinghydro power on smaller local streams would also diversify the grid so it would be harder for terrorists to interrupt our power system. Polution would not be a problem, and they run with minimal personal...
How much safer is nuclear energy today? Can we recycle the waste? Don't give up on viable alternatives.
i have a bush so i supoport him
page: 1

Jack SmackJun 22nd, 2007 - 04:15:29
Anything that gets the blessing of GWB is immediately ready to be corrupt, unworkable and unjustifiable. people who live downwind of this power plant better ready to move---quickly.
Like we believe that this President and Vice President would have anything to do with anything that does not run on oil. Give me a break!
Report this comment