Oil and Gas Features
Background: Oil companies nurture pipelines as key assets
Aug 8, 2006, 19:23 GMT
Hamburg - Oil companies like BP generally conduct constant checks on pipelines, which are key assets that they cannot afford to idle, a leading international pipeline engineer said Tuesday.
This week's shutdown of the Prudhoe Bay pipeline in Alaska because of corrosion is an 'utter exception,' said Lars Bangert, director of pipeline systems at ILF, a Munich-based consulting engineering firm.
'I don't know one other case in the past 15 years where a pipeline had to shut down because of corrosion,' he told Deutsche Presse- Agentur dpa in an interview.
Records show most shutdowns are caused by third-party damage, such as being rammed by bulldozers.
Generally, oil companies spend heavily to maintain their pipelines, said Bangert. Robotic devices, so-called pipeline pigs, float through the pipes, checking wall thickness and hunting for corrosion and cracks.
'An oil company knows every square centimetre of its pipelines,' he said. 'They are key capital assets.'
Most companies subject pipelines to a major check-up every 10 years or so.
Pipelines are also equipped with sensors to monitor pressure, temperature and flow rates.
Crude oil contains some water as well as corrosive gases such as hydrogen sulphide.
Without specific knowledge, Bangert speculated that the BP pipeline could have been corroded by an accumulation of salty water at a low point in the line.
Corrosive components in crude oil vary among fields and can be reduced by filtration before the oil is pumped. But even tiny, residual quantities of some substances can cause corrosion. Water is denser than oil, so it settles in the bottom of a pipe.
Pipeline pigs can clean the pipe and suck up accumulated water.
If corrosion does set in, repair crews can put a metal sleeve up to 2 metres long on the outside of the pipe, Bangert said.
If a pipeline is badly rusted, as appears to have happened in Alaska, whole sections have to be replaced. The rust threat increases with age. BP says that its northern Alaska line is nearly 30 years old and much more badly rusted than originally believed.
Bangert, whose firm designs modern pipelines, said that Arctic temperatures could be a factor, because long periods of extreme cold make steel brittle and more likely to crack.
The outsides of modern pipelines are generally protected from corrosion by rust-proof coatings and cathodic protection systems that fight rust electrically.
© 2006 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Oil and Gas
- 1. I made this
- 2. Taiwan to negotiate with Venezuela over oil exploration
- 3. From Turkey's dreams of empire to the energy Great Game
- 4. Power and profitability: Europe's gas security dilemma
- 5. Oil drilling off Alaska, Virginia proposed by US
Older Talkback
page: 1
There is absolutely no excuse for this problem to be this big. This is negligence bordering on being 'on purpose'. If this pipeline is so important to BP... how could these problems escape their notice?
It's all linked to profit... theirs, at our expense.
page: 1

JohnanonAug 8th, 2006 - 21:11:45
It would seem to be an ongoing problem with BP, neglecting maintainence at their key operations. The explosion at the BP Refinery in Texas City was due to the failure of a level control device. A device that had been in operation at that plant since the 1960's. At that age, it was less a failure and more a miracle that the unit still worked at all. Now, we see more evidence of neglect to save a few maintainence pennies only to lose millions of dollars or pounds because of those same, meager savings.
Report this comment