Europe Features
Dutch plan to ban burqa days ahead of election
By Rohan Minogue Nov 18, 2006, 14:01 GMT
Amsterdam - The ban on the burqa announced by hardline Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk came almost a year after the cabinet began considering the issue - and less than a week before the country votes in a closely fought general election.
The proposed ban - which has yet to go before parliament and, if passed, is certain to face a challenge in the courts - came as opinion polls showed Verdonk's liberal VVD party losing ground.
Shortly before Christmas last year the Dutch parliament passed a motion put forward by maverick anti-immigration politician Geert Wilders calling for a ban.
The motion received support from the ruling Christian Democrats and their VVD coalition partners.
Verdonk, who said she regarded the burqa as 'a symbol of social division,' expressed broad support at the time but added she suspected there might be legal problems and that experts were to report on the issue in January this year.
Muslim leaders expressed a mixture of astonishment and amusement at the fuss. The burqa and niqab - garments worn by observant Muslim women in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf - are rare sights.
'I have yet to see my first burqa on the street in the Netherlands,' was the response of Haci Karacaer of the Milli Gorus association of Turkish mosques.
A journalist who went out onto the streets wearing one reported reactions from Muslims ranging from the amazed to the scurrilous.
There the matter rested until Friday afternoon, when Verdonk announced that the panel of experts had finally reported there were no legal objections and that she would propose a ban to parliament 'as soon as possible.'
'The cabinet finds it undesirable that clothing that covers the face - such as the burqa - is worn in public, out of consideration for public order, safety and the security of other citizens,' she said in a formal statement.
Opposition to the burqa and to the hijab, a scarf that covers the hair, ears and neck but not the face, is widespread in Europe. French and German education authorities have long wrestled with whether teachers and students should be allowed to wear them.
Jack Straw, a former British foreign secretary, generated a storm recently by saying he asked women to remove veils when they came to his constituency office.
But Verdonk's announcement - and more particularly its timing - drew a sceptical reaction, especially as Wilder's party is gathering support among those fearful of the Muslim immigrant population.
The Dutch media and public were in any case far more concerned with reports that military intelligence officers had maltreated prisoners in southern Iraq three years ago.
'It's just election politics,' said Anneke, a Dutchwoman, over a beer in an Amsterdam bar with a group of friends. 'Wilders' group is taking votes away from the VVD, and Verdonk wants to undermine him.'
© 2006 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Europe
- 1. Pope in Easter message calls for peace and religious tolerance
- 2. Magnificent Messi leads Barcelona to ninth straight win
- 3. Pope leads Easter vigil, calls for "true enlightenment"
- 4. Barcelona increase pressure on Real with romp in Zaragoza
- 5. Pope Benedict XVI leads Easter Vigil
Older Talkback
page: 1
It kills the Westerners to think that Muslim women actually choose to wear it. Only thing they want to believe is that women are forced to wear it by men.
Look at the countries like Turkey or Tunisia that government banned it and discourage it. But the Muslim women continue to wear it with big numbers. In the BBC news, they said 65% of the all women in Turkey wear veil.
Very, very small percentage of women are forced to wear it by men but nearly all women wear it because they choose to wear it.
We all know why they can't ban the full Muslim veil or hijab because Nuns wear the same veil for the same reason.
Why is it when nuns wear veil, people consider them holy and pious but when Muslim women wear veil, people consider them 'submissive and oppressed'?
Lol, someone removed ever single comment that supported the Dutch no matter how benign, while leaving every paranoid anti-western post by Tarikur. Very professional.
Eric, dude that is different article and this is new article. The article you talking is about this, still there
http://news.monstersandcritics.com/europe/article_1223285.php/Outoing_D utch_cabinet_to_propose_law_banning_full_veil_in_public
It is a telling article. In a place that has legalized everything ie. drug use, prostitution, euthenasia, they object to a woman covering her face...
A good lesson for anyone who thinks liberals protect your rights.
We, actually have laws prohibiting the wearing of masks in the USA, although they are not directed towards religous coverings. Does the Dutch law specify religous coverings?
page: 1

tarikurNov 18th, 2006 - 15:36:20
This is just show that Europeans have no tolerance and oppress women just as European accuses the Muslim of doing. Banning a woman to wear veil is same as forcing a women to wear veil, both are oppressive to women and violates women's right. Congratulation Dutch people, you guys are just like Taliban.
This just show Europeans don't care about Freedom, Democracy, Diversity, Torlance, Women's Right, Religious' Right, Minority' Right, Human Rights. Next, time preach those things, just laugh at them as jokes.
Report this comment