Europe News
Bush downplays Putin's criticism of US (Roundup)
Feb 14, 2007, 17:59 GMT
Washington - US President George W Bush acknowledged Wednesday disagreements between the United States and Russia on key international issues but emphasized the mutual interests the two countries have in confronting international challenges.
Bush's comments were his first public remarks since Russian President Vladimir Putin's harshly criticized US foreign policy at a defence conference in Munich.
'There's a lot we can work together on,' Bush said of his relationship with Putin, pointing to both countries' desire to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
'It's a complicated relationship. It's a relationship in which there are disagreements,' Bush said at a news conference at the White House. 'But there's also a relationship in which we can find common ground to solve problems.'
Bush credited Putin's government for voting in favour of UN Security Council sanctions in December to punish Iran for refusing to halt uranium enrichment, and said Russia was 'constructive' in the six-nation talks with North Korea that produced an agreement on Tuesday aimed at ending Pyongyang's nuclear activities.
During a speech Saturday, Putin accused the United States of fomenting a 'very dangerous' environment in the world by overly relying on military force.
'Today we are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper-use of military force in international relations,' Putin said.
Putin also criticized the eastward expansion of NATO that has brought the alliance closer to Russian borders. Bush said he has tried to convince Putin that the enlargement of NATO was 'positive' because it represents the growth of democratic governments.
'Democracies on your border are good things to have,' Bush said, adding: 'I firmly believe NATO is a stabilizing influence for the good.'
'Evidently, he disagrees with that assessment,' Bush said.
The Bush administration has been critical of Putin's 'backsliding' on the development of democratic institutions and crackdown against Russian media. Washington and Moscow, despite working together on Iran, have sharply disagreed over how to bring Tehran into compliance with international rules on its nuclear activities.
In an initial reaction after Putin's remarks over the weekend, White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said the administration was 'surprised and disappointed with President Putin's comments. His accusations are wrong.'
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Europe
- 1. Pope in Easter message calls for peace and religious tolerance
- 2. Magnificent Messi leads Barcelona to ninth straight win
- 3. Pope leads Easter vigil, calls for "true enlightenment"
- 4. Barcelona increase pressure on Real with romp in Zaragoza
- 5. Pope Benedict XVI leads Easter Vigil
Older Talkback
page: 1
page: 1

Seriously?Feb 15th, 2007 - 06:23:26
To say the US relationship with Russia is very complicated seems like a huge understatement. I just can't see any steps Putin is taking now, in the past, or even in the future that could somehow logically be explained as positive steps in the war on terror. Actually, he is doing more to block attempts at combating terrorism than anything else!
Putin sold arms to Iraq just before the US went in to take out Saddam, and even though they didn't work, it's the fact he did it that speaks volumes.
Now Putin is selling air defense missles to Iran to protect from what seems to be unavoidable airstrikes by the US or Israel, or both, to destroy their nuclear reactors, also built by Russia, which got all this started to begin with!
If that weren't enough, Putin is now selling arms to Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, who is as anti-American as it gets! I mean, his best friend is Fidel Castro!
It seems to me that there is a conflict of interest here. At some point the question has to be addressed as to why Putin is so defiant about any democracies being on the border with Russia, and why he only sells arms to terrorist states with dictators who are not only defying the US, but the UN as well! The reason they feel they can violate the UN is because Putin is blocking every attempt the US makes to show the world community is united in condemning their actions! In doing so, Putin is giving these regimes a false sense of security, because Russia is so impotent, Viagra couldn't revive them now!
The good news is that although the UN can be blocked, the US fortunately cannot. However, the question remains; which side is Putin really on? I think the facts speak for themselves.
Report this comment