Europe News
Rift between US and Russia deepens at OSCE meeting (2nd Lead)
Nov 30, 2007, 13:51 GMT
Madrid - A rift between the United States and Russia deepened Friday at an annual meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), with Washington accusing Moscow of 'attacking' the organization's election monitoring rights.
US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns also described Russia's decision to scrap a 1990 key arms control treaty as a 'major mistake.'
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, on the other hand, accused the US and its allies of using the OSCE to promote their political interests, describing the decades-old human rights and security body as being in a 'serious crisis.'
More than 40 ministers from 56 OSCE countries attended the two-day meeting, which was concluding on Friday in the Spanish capital.
Burns stressed the continuing importance of the OSCE, saying it needed to 'stand for European and American values' supported by the vast majority of member countries such as democracy, human rights, election monitoring and arms control.
Burns accused Russia, Uzbekistan and Belarus of 'attacking' the OSCE election monitoring body ODIHR. The organ is boycotting Sunday's parliamentary elections in Russia, citing bureaucratic obstacles which the West believes to have aimed at curtailing the rights of observers.
Russia is seeking to reform the ODIHR, accusing the West of using democracy issues such as election monitoring to push for its interests in former Soviet states.
Burns also slammed Russia for suspending participation in the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) treaty, which President Vladimir Putin signed Friday despite Western attempts to persuade Russia to change its mind in Madrid.
'This is a wrong decision,' Burns said.
'Countries should not unilaterally walk out' of arms treaties, he added, describing Russia as being 'out of step with the majority' of the OSCE countries on election monitoring and arms control.
Burns said he 'regretted' that the OSCE had not been able to take a formal decision on the future of its mission in Kosovo.
The Madrid meeting was, however, expected to agree on two major issues, the future chairmanship of the OSCE and a new mission to ensure border security in Afghanistan.
Burns confirmed that Washington had given its backing to a Kazakh bid to chair the OSCE in 2010 after Kazakhstan 'pledged to protect' the ODIHR.
The US and several other countries had earlier had reserves about the Russian-backed Kazakh bid because of doubts about Astana's democratic credentials.
In a compromise solution, Kazakhstan will take over chairmanship only after Greece in 2010. The next country to chair the OSCE is Finland, which will succeed Spain on January 1.
Belgian Foreign Minister Karel de Gucht expressed 'concern' over the state of the OSCE, saying that a continuing lack of agreement 'has led to an erosion of our achievements.'
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Europe
- 1. Pope in Easter message calls for peace and religious tolerance
- 2. Magnificent Messi leads Barcelona to ninth straight win
- 3. Pope leads Easter vigil, calls for "true enlightenment"
- 4. Barcelona increase pressure on Real with romp in Zaragoza
- 5. Pope Benedict XVI leads Easter Vigil
Older Talkback
page: 1
Burns states that,
Countries should not unilaterally walk out of arms agreements,
describing Russia as being out of step with the majority of the O.S.C.E on
election monitoring and Arms control...(Burns is talking total crap )..it was the U.S who unilaterally pulled out of the S.A.L.T.agreement on nuclear arms
a couple of years back ,also if there were international monitors in Florida in 2000 that clown..Bush.. would not be around to cause the total mess he has.
page: 1

AlNov 30th, 2007 - 18:01:20
Since last may everybody knew Russia was going to leave the CFE. Next it will be INF. There seems to be an opinion within west that another arms race isn't going to happen. The fact is that today oil prices are rising because of demand generated by rising consumption in China and Inda and the great instability in the middle east. The arms race is on.
The west has less control of manipulating the oil price then it used to do. Addition to this is the the US dollar and western economies and the continuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The shoe is now trully on the other foot. It is west that is in peril, it can't afford an arms race with Russia and china. Take a look at France or the poverty striking the inner cities of US. If one predicted the oil would be $100 a year ago it would have been dismissed as crazy talk.
Report this comment