Dutch anti-Islam film meets with heavy criticism (Roundup)

Mar 28, 2008, 15:17 GMT

A screenshot made available 27 March 2008 by www.liveleak.com from the islam critic film \'Fitna\' by Dutch politician Geert Wilders. The film Fitna - critical of the Koran and made by controversial MP Geert Wilders, one of the Netherlands\' most outspoken Islam critics - has been put on the internet on 27 March 2008.

The Hague - Criticism from home and abroad of Dutch opposition lawmaker Geert Wilders' anti-Islam film grew Friday after Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende appeared on television to distance the government from the film.

Balkenende spoke shortly after the film, Fitna - in which Wilders draws links between terrorist acts by Muslim extremists and the words of the Koran - was posted on the www.liveleak.com website Thursday evening. In the run-up to the film's release, Wilders had described the Koran as a 'fascist book' that incites people to violence.

The prime minister told reporters during a press conference that the Dutch government regretted the fact that Wilders had decided to release the film, even though the government had asked him to refrain from making it public.

The European Union condemned the film. 'We believe that acts, such as the above-mentioned film, serve no other purpose than inflaming hatred,' a statement from the Slovenian EU presidency said Friday.

'The European Union and its member states apply the principle of the freedom of speech which is part of our values and traditions. However, it should be exercised in a spirit of respect for religious and other beliefs and convictions.'

EU foreign ministers holding an informal meeting in the Slovenian town of Brdo echoed that sentiment in an implicit condemnation of Wilders' move.

'The message that goes out from Britain is that one can and should combine strong commitment to values of freedom of speech with at the same time respect for religious and racial diversity,' Britain's Foreign Secretary David Miliband said.

'Freedoms are not really freedoms if they hurt someone, so let's be very careful with the way how we use our freedoms,' Slovenian Foreign Minister Dimitrij Rupel, who hosted the meeting, said.

Reaction from Muslim countries was swift. Tehran warned of the 'consequences of such a provocative move,' as Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad-Ali Hosseini termed the video 'insulting and anti- Islamic' and symbolic of the 'deep antagonism' of some Western states towards Islam and Muslims.

Indonesian Foreign Ministry spokesman Kristiarto Legowo said the contents of the film were 'misleading and full of racism' and called the production of the film an 'irresponsible action done under the blanket of freedom of the press.'

Indonesian House of Representatives Speaker Agung Laksono said the government must 'take action' against the film because internet users could easily download and distribute it, triggering religious conflict.

Pakistan summoned the Dutch ambassador to condemn 'the defamatory film which deeply offended the sentiments of Muslims all over the world and which was expected to result in expressions of strong abhorrence and outrage.'

Fitna, which means the split between believers and infidels, is accompanied by the dramatic music Asa's Death, part of the Peer Gynt Suite by Norwegian composer Edvard Grieg in 1875 and is a compilation of Koran verses and old video footage.

The Koran verses are primarily sections interpreted as calling on Muslims to attack and destroy enemies of the faith.

It also shows the attacks on New York's World Trade Centre towers on September 11, 2001, and the London Underground on July 7, 2005, and video footage of Muslim terrorists executing Western hostages.

The film suggests that violent passages from the Koran are directly used by Muslims as legitimization to commit violence and will ultimately endanger Western democratic and liberal values.

The film ends by calling on the audience to do everything possible to counter what Wilders calls 'the danger of the Islamization of the Netherlands.'

Reaction in the Netherlands was more subdued. Mark Rutte, leader of the Dutch Liberal VVD party - of which Geert Wilders himself was a member until being thrown out in September 2004 - said the film 'did not contain any new images.'

'The Netherlands does not need Wilders as a filmmaker. We need Wilders as a legislator, to debate about the Netherlands and to find solutions for serious problems, including the problems of integration and immigration.'

Iranian-born Afshin Ellian, a professor in the philosophy of law affiliated with the universities of Leiden and Amsterdam, said Geert Wilders 'must have been advised by the best mullahs.'

'Wilders stayed perfectly within the realm of what sharia or Muslim law permits. No images of Mohammed or Allah, and no material that may be blasphemous to Muslims.'

Minister of Integration Ella Vogelaar (Labour) did sound a word of warning, saying the film could increase people's fears of Islamic radicalism.

'The first half of the film contained shocking material,' she said.

Meanwhile, the Dutch public prosecutor's office said it would investigate whether the film violated anti-discrimination legislation.

A Danish newspaper cartoonist criticized the 'misuse' of his controversial cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed in Wilders' film.

'My cartoon has been misused again. It has been pulled from its original context and set in a completely different one,' cartoonist Kurt Westergaard told Danish broadcaster DR.

'Wilders has not asked me for permission, so it is simply a case of violation of copyright rules,' Westergaard said, adding he would contact legal experts Friday.