Europe News
NATO to re-start formal talks with Russia (Roundup)
Mar 5, 2009, 15:30 GMT

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton jokes during a goup photo with Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini (C) and British Foreign Secretary David Miliband (R) after first meeting during the Nato Foreign ministers meeting in Brussels, Belgium, 05 March 2009. NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer called for the alliance to resume top-level talks with Russia which have been frozen since last August\'s war in Georgia. EPA/OLIVIER HOSLET
Brussels - In a further sign of rapprochement between the West and Russia since the election of US President Barack Obama, NATO foreign ministers on Thursday agreed to re-engage in formal talks with Moscow.
While insisting that 'fundamental differences' remain, '(NATO) ministers reached an agreement to formally resume the NATO-Russia Council (NRC),' said NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.
'Russia is an important player, a global player. Not talking to them is not an option,' the NATO chief said.
Ministers stressed that the alliance was still deeply angered by Russia's decision to invade Georgia and recognize its breakaway territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in August.
But they also acknowledged that they needed Russian help in providing alternative supply routes into Afghanistan, preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction and stepping up the global fight against terrorism.
De Hoop Scheffer said NATO and Russian ministers would likely talk for the first time since NRC meetings were frozen over the August conflict in Georgia soon after the alliance's April 3-4 summit in Strasbourg.
The news was greeted positively in Moscow, where a foreign ministry spokesman told the Interfax news agency that 'common sense has finally prevailed'.
Thursday's meeting in Brussels was the first to be attended by new US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who sources close to the talks said had been particularly vocal in stressing the need to 'explore a fresh start' with Russia.
However, what had been portrayed as a formality ahead of the meeting quickly ran into trouble, with Lithuania initially stalling any progress.
'I think it's a bit premature to open formal dialogue. I think we have to use this time before the summit and encourage Russia to be more cooperative on all the various questions which are a part of NATO security agenda,' Lithuanian Foreign Minister Vygaudas Usackas said at the start of the talks.
Lithuania's concerns were echoed by Georgia and Ukraine, with the two former Soviet republics hastily convening meetings with NATO ministers.
Seeking to allay such concerns, de Hoop Scheffer reiterated NATO's view that both countries should eventually be allowed to join the alliance.
Thursday's decision came as Georgian officials accused Russia of repeatedly violating the country's airspace, in a sign of the continued tensions in the region.
NATO ministers decided to suspend meetings of the NRC - the usual format for talks with Russia - on August 19 as a sign that there could be 'no business as usual' with Moscow.
But in recent months, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's 26 members have decided that it is time for the alliance to re-engage with Russia in order to tackle major international issues at a time of global economic crisis.
'NATO and Russia need to work together,' said Britain's David Miliband, whose country has been traditionally wary of Moscow's renewed assertiveness.
Thursday's decision came on the back of reports of high-level contacts between Washington and Moscow over a controversial missile defence shield due to be built in Poland and the Czech Republic.
Moscow has perceived the shield, an idea of former US President George W Bush, as a direct threat to its nuclear deterrent.
But in a recent hand-delivered letter to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, Obama suggested that such a shield would not be needed if Iranian efforts to secure a nuclear bomb were halted.
The talks over Russia stole precious time from planned discussions on how to beef up the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan and finalize its role in providing security during the August 20 presidential and provincial elections.
The US administration is currently busy finalising a strategic review of its nearly eight-year-old fight against the Taliban insurgency.
Such a review is expected to emphasis the need to boost the civilian side of the US and NATO mission in Afghanistan and call for a regional solution to the problem.
In this context, Clinton proposed a regional conference on Afghanistan with key players such as NATO, the UN, Russia, India and Pakistan.
The conference is expected to take place just days before the NATO summit.

COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Europe
- 1. Pope in Easter message calls for peace and religious tolerance
- 2. Magnificent Messi leads Barcelona to ninth straight win
- 3. Pope leads Easter vigil, calls for "true enlightenment"
- 4. Barcelona increase pressure on Real with romp in Zaragoza
- 5. Pope Benedict XVI leads Easter Vigil
Older Talkback
page: 1
'Now NATO finally has got the message!'
I wonder when lance will.
'I wonder when lance will.'
I missed the memo on being a good christian citizen and ignoring the U.S. proliferating nukes, priests raping children, and U.S. citizens killing about 800,000 of their babies (sometimes by sucking their brains out), among many other things.
Can you please post the memo so I can read it?
'Can you please post the memo so I can read it?'
I couldn't do that because any reference to the alleged memo exists only in lance's alleged mind. What does this have to do with the story, anyway?
Lance might be able to read this memo ,IF it existed, but there is no way that he could understand it. The cabbage patch baby had his brains sucked out.
f--k lance in the ear.scum
lance needs be killed dismembered and feed to the pigs as well as sp4.
both are the scum of the earth along with ex pres. G.W.B and his hateful mother .
The NATO is an aggressive military alliance ultimately under the US command and as such - a clear danger to any non-NATO nation.
The ultimate goal of the NATO is to promote the interests of the West in general and of US in particular by a military means.
That should be clear to anyone and is surely clear to Russians.
After Belgrade - is it Moscow?
Why are you bringning in Belgrade into this?Bad idea,last time Ichecked we had ethnic cleansing operated by Mlaic and Karadcic against Kroats and Albanians,with as a result bloodbaths like Srbrenica.That was a bad idea alex,let me guess,you are a serbian nationalist ?
page: 1

lanceMar 5th, 2009 - 15:52:31
'prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction'
Oh, thank the gods! NATO is finally going to do its job and force the U.S. to stop supplying WMDs to the world.
Pakistan, India, Iraq, Iran, Isreal (to list just a few) all have WMDs or had them complements of the United States.
Now NATO finally has got the message!
Or, do they mean enable the spread to some countries and not others?
Hypocrisy is once again at work while the politicians toil within the confines of their little box.
Read more: 'NATO chief calls for renewed relations with Russia'
Report this comment