Middle East News
21 killed, Sadr leader arrested, raids on others (2nd Roundup)
May 19, 2007, 14:07 GMT
Baghdad - Violence continued in parts of Iraq on Saturday, with the killing of 18 civilians and at least three Iraqi soldiers, the arrest of 152 militants and the arrest of a leading Sadr movement figure.
Unidentified gunmen in Iraqi army uniforms shot dead 13 civilians in a village near the town of Mindli in Diyala province on Saturday morning, the independent Voices of Iraq news agency reported quoting a police source.
The town is located 80 kilometres south of the provincial capital Baquba, 60 kilometres north of Baghdad.
In a second attack in Diyala on Saturday, gunmen opened fire on a civilian vehicle in the Khalis district of Baquba, killing at least four people and wounding two others before escaping, an Iraqi security source said.
Iraqi security forces on Saturday announced they had killed four gunmen and arrested 152 suspected militants in several areas during a combat mission in various parts of Baghdad.
Three Iraqi soldiers were killed and 12 wounded during the operation, Voices of Iraq said, quoting from a statement by the Baghdad operations command.
Another Iraqi was killed and four others wounded when a suicide bomber driving a car bomb blew himself up near an Iraqi checkpoint in Yarmouk suburbs in western Baghdad on Saturday, according to an Iraqi police source.
Three Iraqi children were killed and four others and an elderly woman were seriously wounded in an explosion caused by a hand grenade which the children had found on a rubbish dump, police said. The incidence occurred in Ziqar province, about 390 kilometres south of Baghdad.
British forces were meanwhile reported to have arrested a leading figure from the Sadr movement, which is led by Shiite cleric and militia leader Moqtada al-Sadr.
'British forces this morning arrested Sheikh Aws al-Khafaji at Basra airport while he was on his way to travel from Iraq,' a source told Voices of Iraq. Another source said the arrest took place in the departures hall of the airport.
Al-Khafaji was appointed by al-Sadr to as the Friday sermon imam in the southern Iraqi city of Nassiriyah.
Reports of his arrest come a day after Iraqi security forces raided the houses of 10 officials of the Sadr movement and arrested several of their relatives in Hindiya district, near Karbala about 108 kilometres south west of Baghdad, Voices of Iraq reported.
Voices of Iraq quoted a source from al-Sadr's office confirming the arrest but providing no names or saying whether the officials were home at the time of the raids.
The source also gave no reason for the arrest of their relatives. Sadr occupies 30 seats in the 275-seat Iraqi parliament under the umbrella of the Mahdi Army, the largest armed militia in Iraq.
The political movement of al-Sadr, a strong critic of the United States has been at loggerheads with Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government over to al-Maliki's refusal to define a timetable for the pullout of US troops from Iraq.
In further political developments, Iraq requested the US and Iran to exclude the Iranian nuclear programme and Shiite Lebanese Hezbollah group from the upcoming Iranian-US talks due to be held in Baghdad, press reports said Saturday.
The US and Iran were expected to discuss the issue of weapons leaked from Iran to groups defined as 'terrorist' by the US, the Mujahedin al-Khalq organization, US manoeuvres in the Gulf and the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, according to the state-run al- Sabah newspaper.
Al-Khalq is a militant political party that advocates overthrowing the government in the Islamic Republic of Iran and replacing it with its own leadership.
Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari is expected to represent Iraq in the talks which are scheduled to take place at the headquarters of the Iraqi Foreign Ministry.
US Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker was to meet with Iranian representatives in Baghdad on May 28 amid US accusations that Tehran has been fomenting violence in Iraq by providing material support to Shiite militant groups responsible for attacks on US soldiers as well as aggravating Shiite and Sunni tensions.
The US and Iran severed formal diplomatic relations in 1980, and discussions in Baghdad are believed to be the highest contact between the two governments in years.
On Friday, a cleric close to Iraqi Shiite leader Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani said that the talks were 'the first promising step for free and direct bilateral talks' between the two adversaries.
Since the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, al-Sistani has been playing an increasing political role in Iraq. Western media have called him the 'most influential' figure in post-invasion Iraq.
In his Friday sermon in a mosque in the holy city of Najaf, 140 kilometres south of Baghdad, Shiite Imam Sadr Eddin al-Qabanji expressed hopes that the Iranian-US talks would lead to peace between US and Iran amid regional concerns over a potential war.
Al-Qabanji added that although these talks would be focused on Iraq, Iraqis themselves had to have the final say on Iraqi affairs.
US-led coalition forces on Saturday announced the detention of nine suspects in the May 12 kidnapping of three US soldiers as search operations for the missing soldiers continued.
The nine were detained during a raid Saturday morning near the western city of Amiriyah. The soldiers were reported missing after an attack to the west of the town of Mahmudiya, 35 kilometres south of Baghdad, during which four servicemen and an Iraqi were killed.
Last Sunday, a militant group named the Iraqi Islamic State published a statement on the internet, claiming to be holding hostage the three 'soldiers of the cross.'
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Middle East
- 1. Jerusalem prelate tells Arab Spring youth to have confidence
- 2. More than 100 killed in Syria ahead of ceasefire deadline
- 3. At least 43 killed in Syria, despite UN criticism
- 4. 19 killed in Syria as ceasefire deadline approaches
- 5. Pilgrims flock to Jerusalem for Easter, Passover
Older Talkback
page: 1
You really need to go back to the middle east where you will fit right in.
I wonder whether the real forces behind the war in Iraq(Israel,Mossad Shin Bet and Jewish pressure groups in U.S)ever imagined the scale of tragedy they were about to unleash on Iraqi people U.S Soldiers........
'I Wonder Alan Hurd U.K'
LOL... Sockpuppet
Two atomic bombs cured a very radical people in history. Maybe it time to to rethink our methods in the Middle East. Is 3600 Americans lives lost worth trying to stabizing Irag? Two N-bombs on Iran will bring about a quick peace in the region.
You Idiot it was the Americans and the British who attacked Iraq. Are you totally stupid or do you read news no one else does.
A radical cure for a radical people.
One Earth one people. Peace is not the absence of war it is a disposition in the hearts and minds of the all the people of the Earth. There is still good out there!
Islam is a cancer period.... A intolerent religous movement set on world domination thru force.
Any Nation or people with the mind set to destroy ISRAEL shell be distroyed.
Europe is the HOUSE of Israel. U.S. was founded by the House of Israel. Anglo-Saxon is the House of Israel. Read your history CHUMP.
Why do jews have huge hook noses?
Because air is free!
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Why do Jews Steal Palestinian and other neighbor’s land?
Because it is free
ha ha ha ha ha
RE: Reality StrikesMay 19th, 2007 - 18:19:22
Two atomic bombs cured a very radical people in history. Maybe it time to to rethink our methods in the Middle East. Is 3600 Americans lives lost worth trying to stabizing Irag? Two N-bombs on Iran will bring about a quick peace in the region.
-----------------------
While this venue is a fit place to rant and vent, occasionally reality has to intrude on such inane commentary.
At the point Truman used nuclear weapons, the Japanese had effectively lost the conflict, but had not surrendered. Truman's stated intention in ordering the bombings was to bring about a quick resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction, that was sufficient to cause Japan to surrender. The first bombing of Hiroshima was not adequate, and a second attack on Nagaski was required. Wikipedia has an excellent link covering all of the details.
Iran is not the same situation. Firstly, there's no declared war. Secondly, the purpose in attacking Iran would be to take out their nuclear capability. Japan had none. The logistics of knocking out ALL of Iran's capability are far too complex to deal with here, but some Googling should bring up discussions. Iran has no doubt hardened some of the research facilities, and any such attacks would make things worse for the U.S. politically, bringing together nations against who who otherwise don't even like each other. On top of this, Iran has energy deals with Pakistan, India, and Russia. Who would our allies be? Europe gets much of their gas through Russian-controlled pipelines.
The Bush Administration, rather than working to defuse tensions, instead antagonizes others, in its own inimitable style. We are hearing regularly from leaders in the Mideast asking for a more rational approach.
Lastly, Iran would retailiate by interfering with oil production, and Chavez would likely join on THEIR bandwagon.
Globalsecurity.org is one such site, and I'll extract from there:
In all, there are perhaps two dozen suspected nuclear facilities in Iran. The 1000-megawatt nuclear plant Bushehr would likely be the target of such strikes. According to the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, the spent fuel from this facility would be capable of producing 50 to 75 bombs. Also, the suspected nuclear facilities at Natanz and Arak will likely be targets of an air attack.
American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq. Using the full force of operational B-2 stealth bombers, staging from Diego Garcia or flying direct from the United States, possibly supplemented by F-117 stealth fighters staging from al Udeid in Qatar or some other location in theater, the two-dozen suspect nuclear sites would be targeted.
Military planners could tailor their target list to reflect the preferences of the Administration by having limited air strikes that would target only the most crucial facilities in an effort to delay or obstruct the Iranian program or the United States could opt for a far more comprehensive set of strikes against a comprehensive range of WMD related targets, as well as conventional and unconventional forces that might be used to counterattack against US forces in Iraq.
page: 1

Bush-B-Liar plan to reduce the shia majorityMay 19th, 2007 - 15:11:56
Will the bush-b-liar paln succeed, most likely not. Islam is for domination, by its realistic approach. Hypocricies like 'TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK' 'LOVING ALL HUMAN BEINGS' 'A HELPLESS MAN DYING FOR YOUR SINS...SO THAT YOU CAN KILL THE INNOCENT AND DO ALL OTHER SOCIAL AND PERSONAL CRIMES' And the like, are not tolerated in ISLAM.
Report this comment