Middle East News

21 killed, Sadr leader arrested, raids on others (2nd Roundup)

May 19, 2007, 14:07 GMT

On the Web



Your Talkback on this Story

Similar articles

Explosion in southern Iraq kills at least 12
Five killed in northern Iraq bomb attacks
Car bombs kill two people in northern Iraq
Iraqi officers targeted by bombings amid security handover
Attacks kill six in northern Iraq

Latest Headlines in Middle East

Older Talkback

page: 1 

Bush-B-Liar plan to reduce the shia majorityMay 19th, 2007 - 15:11:56

Will the bush-b-liar paln succeed, most likely not. Islam is for domination, by its realistic approach. Hypocricies like 'TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK' 'LOVING ALL HUMAN BEINGS' 'A HELPLESS MAN DYING FOR YOUR SINS...SO THAT YOU CAN KILL THE INNOCENT AND DO ALL OTHER SOCIAL AND PERSONAL CRIMES' And the like, are not tolerated in ISLAM.

Report this comment

You are a cancer on humanityMay 19th, 2007 - 17:08:27

You really need to go back to the middle east where you will fit right in.

Report this comment

I Wonder Alan Hurd U.KMay 19th, 2007 - 17:31:46

I wonder whether the real forces behind the war in Iraq(Israel,Mossad Shin Bet and Jewish pressure groups in U.S)ever imagined the scale of tragedy they were about to unleash on Iraqi people U.S Soldiers........

Report this comment

-you are a filthy apeMay 19th, 2007 - 18:11:08

'I Wonder Alan Hurd U.K'

LOL... Sockpuppet

Report this comment

Reality StrikesMay 19th, 2007 - 18:19:22

Two atomic bombs cured a very radical people in history. Maybe it time to to rethink our methods in the Middle East. Is 3600 Americans lives lost worth trying to stabizing Irag? Two N-bombs on Iran will bring about a quick peace in the region.

Report this comment

To The Chimp AboveMay 19th, 2007 - 18:25:45

You Idiot it was the Americans and the British who attacked Iraq. Are you totally stupid or do you read news no one else does.

Report this comment

Remaking IslamMay 19th, 2007 - 18:28:57

A radical cure for a radical people.

Report this comment

brosiumMay 19th, 2007 - 18:31:22

One Earth one people. Peace is not the absence of war it is a disposition in the hearts and minds of the all the people of the Earth. There is still good out there!

Report this comment

Reality StrikesMay 19th, 2007 - 18:38:14

Islam is a cancer period.... A intolerent religous movement set on world domination thru force.

Report this comment

Reality StrikesMay 19th, 2007 - 18:47:21

Any Nation or people with the mind set to destroy ISRAEL shell be distroyed.
Europe is the HOUSE of Israel. U.S. was founded by the House of Israel. Anglo-Saxon is the House of Israel. Read your history CHUMP.

Report this comment

hook noseMay 19th, 2007 - 19:55:29

Why do jews have huge hook noses?
Because air is free!

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Report this comment

Free LandMay 19th, 2007 - 21:36:43

Why do Jews Steal Palestinian and other neighbor’s land?
Because it is free
ha ha ha ha ha

Report this comment

pbMay 20th, 2007 - 00:14:18

RE: Reality StrikesMay 19th, 2007 - 18:19:22

Two atomic bombs cured a very radical people in history. Maybe it time to to rethink our methods in the Middle East. Is 3600 Americans lives lost worth trying to stabizing Irag? Two N-bombs on Iran will bring about a quick peace in the region.

-----------------------

While this venue is a fit place to rant and vent, occasionally reality has to intrude on such inane commentary.

At the point Truman used nuclear weapons, the Japanese had effectively lost the conflict, but had not surrendered. Truman's stated intention in ordering the bombings was to bring about a quick resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction, that was sufficient to cause Japan to surrender. The first bombing of Hiroshima was not adequate, and a second attack on Nagaski was required. Wikipedia has an excellent link covering all of the details.

Iran is not the same situation. Firstly, there's no declared war. Secondly, the purpose in attacking Iran would be to take out their nuclear capability. Japan had none. The logistics of knocking out ALL of Iran's capability are far too complex to deal with here, but some Googling should bring up discussions. Iran has no doubt hardened some of the research facilities, and any such attacks would make things worse for the U.S. politically, bringing together nations against who who otherwise don't even like each other. On top of this, Iran has energy deals with Pakistan, India, and Russia. Who would our allies be? Europe gets much of their gas through Russian-controlled pipelines.

The Bush Administration, rather than working to defuse tensions, instead antagonizes others, in its own inimitable style. We are hearing regularly from leaders in the Mideast asking for a more rational approach.

Lastly, Iran would retailiate by interfering with oil production, and Chavez would likely join on THEIR bandwagon.

Globalsecurity.org is one such site, and I'll extract from there:

In all, there are perhaps two dozen suspected nuclear facilities in Iran. The 1000-megawatt nuclear plant Bushehr would likely be the target of such strikes. According to the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, the spent fuel from this facility would be capable of producing 50 to 75 bombs. Also, the suspected nuclear facilities at Natanz and Arak will likely be targets of an air attack.

American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq. Using the full force of operational B-2 stealth bombers, staging from Diego Garcia or flying direct from the United States, possibly supplemented by F-117 stealth fighters staging from al Udeid in Qatar or some other location in theater, the two-dozen suspect nuclear sites would be targeted.

Military planners could tailor their target list to reflect the preferences of the Administration by having limited air strikes that would target only the most crucial facilities in an effort to delay or obstruct the Iranian program or the United States could opt for a far more comprehensive set of strikes against a comprehensive range of WMD related targets, as well as conventional and unconventional forces that might be used to counterattack against US forces in Iraq.

Report this comment

page: 1 

Like M&C on Facebook

Custom Search
Viral Web