Middle East News
ANALYSIS: Experts see Arab role foggy on Palestinian rift
By Abdul Jalil Mustafa Jun 20, 2007, 13:59 GMT
Amman - Arab countries appeared on Wednesday divided on how to deal with the Palestinian dilemma that surfaced after last week's takeover of the Gaza Strip by the Islamic radical Hamas group, according to Jordanian political analysts.
'Two axes appear to be gaining ground,' Ghazi Rababaa, professor of political science at the University of Jordan, told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa.
'Egypt (is) leading a move to cluster support around (Palestinian) President Mahmoud Abbas, while Saudi Arabia prefers dialogue' between Hamas and Abbas' more moderate Fatah, whose forces were crushed by Hamas militants in Gaza, the professor said.
Egypt's lead found expression in the symbolic but meaningful step of moving its diplomatic mission from Gaza to Ramallah.
The Saudis appear ready to toe a more neutral line by insisting on the Mecca accord as the term of reference for dealing with the inter-Palestinian feuding.
'This can be inferred from the latest remarks by Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, who made it clear that Riyadh would stick to the provisions of the Mecca agreement,' Rababaa said.
The February agreement came after Saudi leaders hosted a meeting at the Grand Mosque of Mecca that grouped leaders of Hamas (which swept the January 2006 general elections) and the electoral losers Fatah.
In compliance with the document, a Palestinian national unity government was formed in March with Ismail Haniya, a Hamas leader, returned as prime minister.
The March cabinet failed however to draw across-the-board support from the world's donors, which insisted on the boycott of Hamas ministers, a move largely seen as one of the key factors that prompted the recent military confrontation in Gaza.
'I believe the United States and other donors will be putting pressure on all Arab countries to join Egypt in extending outright support to Abbas to give the impression that a prosperous Palestinian entity can emerge in the West Bank, while the Gaza Strip remains an isolated territory,' Rababaa said.
He made note of the backing voiced over the past few days for the newly-formed Palestinian emergency government by the United States and the European Union, which also promised to resume economic aid to the Palestinian Authority that was suspended following Hamas' election victory 18 months ago.
Other analysts saw a very slim chance of the Palestinian division being patched up without Arab intervention.
'I don't see any chance of bridging the Palestinian gap without Arab intervention,' Taher Adwan, chief editor of the daily newspaper al-Arab al-Yawm, told dpa.
'Arab governments have first to come up with a formula to deal with the issue other than the Mecca agreement, which is no longer suitable for addressing Palestinian feuds.'
'This is because no chance now exists of forming a Palestinian national unity government that groups Hamas and Fatah again,' he added.
'One of the possible scenarios is a compromise between Saudi Arabia and (key Hamas supporter) Syria,' he said.
An Arab League investigation panel was set up last week to probe Hamas' takeover of the Gaza Strip, but the move hit immediate snags when Abbas' Fatah movement appeared to have rejected the idea.
Hamas' Jordanian ally, the Islamic Action Front (IAF), seemed to attach special importance to the Arab role in addressing the Palestinian split, but they saw the success of such an effort conditional on preserving Arab 'impartiality.'
'The international and Arab bias with any party will not serve the Palestinian cause or Palestinian unity,' the IAF said in a statement.
The IAF, the political arm of the influential Muslim Brotherhood movement, urged the governments of Jordan and other Arab countries 'to take a neutral stand and to respect the democratic choice of the Palestinian people,' a reference to the majority that Hamas enjoys in the Palestinian Legislative Council.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Middle East
- 1. Jerusalem prelate tells Arab Spring youth to have confidence
- 2. More than 100 killed in Syria ahead of ceasefire deadline
- 3. At least 43 killed in Syria, despite UN criticism
- 4. 19 killed in Syria as ceasefire deadline approaches
- 5. Pilgrims flock to Jerusalem for Easter, Passover
Older Talkback
page: 1
For how long has this war been going on for? Hamas, Israel, somebody please finish this damn fight!
The real point here is that Islam is divided. It may not be politically correct to say so but it is going through the same stuff Christianity went through with Martin Luthor and the reformation.
Eventually, both sides will be able to live together and side-by-side with the rest of the non-islamic world (as Christianity learned to do). However, before then, there must be enough death and destruction to make peace more important than the ideals they are presently fighting for.
There has been very little peace in Israel/Palestine over the last 2000 years, just like there has been very little peace in Iraq over the same period of time and a few words from the US,EU or Saudi Arabia are not going to solve these situations this or any decade soon.
Jeremy King:
Israel could 'finish the fight' in about a day if it acted as do countries that are not hamstrung by the scrutiny of the so-called 'international community'. The Russians bomb Chechnya into oblivion and the U.S. runs around the globe pursuing its enemies and bombing foreign territory, but the minute Israel acts to protect itself against enemies that are just across its borders or even in its midst, the world passes another anti-Israel UN resolution. Even the bloodthirsty, fanatical Islamic supremacists of Hamas are considered 'hands-off' by the world community, such that Israel is trapped in an unnatural conflict of slow attrition.
page: 1

NoharnessJun 20th, 2007 - 14:36:50
In other words, the US, Fatah and Israel stand alone in the face of Hamas's aggression and its desire to establish a world wide Islamic Oligarchy. There is nothing neutral about the Saudi stance or the IAF's agenda.
Quoting the first paragraph of the Mecca Agreement: 'First: to ban the shedding of Palestinian blood and to take all measures and arrangements to prevent the shedding of Palestinian blood and to stress the importance of national unity as the basis for national steadfastness and confronting the occupation and to achieve the legitimate national goals of the Palestinian people and adopt the language of dialogue as the sole basis for solving political disagreements in the Palestinian arena.'
First, there is not and never has been a nation of Palestine. Second what are the goals of Palestinian Arabs? First and foremost is the destruction of Israel. Second is a world dominated by a Theocratic Oligarchy based on Islam, or a 'World Caliphate.'
Fifteen of the nineteen terrorists that perpetrated the World Trade Center Atrocity. It is Saudi Arabia that spends even more money than Iran to spread fundamentalist Islam around the world, especially here in the US. Al Qaeda, Hamas and Hizbullah all share murderous fanaticism in common. All three claim to hate the Saudis, yet we never hear the Saudi Government speak out against this kind of madness. Not once have we heard an Islamic fundamentalist speak out against suicide bombing or teaching unreasoning hatred to children.
Does the United States have any real friends in the Middle East? Only one, Israel. Does the EU have any friends in the Middle East? Europeans may think that they do, but they will soon learn the hard way that they are as much a target of this pernicious theology as the United States and Israel are.
It's time to fish or cut bait, folks.
Report this comment