Middle East News
Bush in Egypt on last leg of ceremonial Middle East tour
May 17, 2008, 7:46 GMT
Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt - US President George Bush, on the last leg of a largely ceremonial tour of the Middle East, was due to meet Egyptian leaders Saturday in the Sharm el-Sheikh resort.
Bush, arriving from Saudi Arabia, was expected to discuss with President Hosny Mubarak a major concern for Arab leaders: the growing influence of Iran against the backdrop of recent violence in Lebanon.
In Sunni-dominated Saudi Arabia, Bush shared his concerns over the rising influence of Shiite Iran, not only in Lebanon, but also in Iraq.
US National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley said both countries shared the concern that Iran would be emboldened by recent events in Lebanon.
The US and Saudi Arabia share the view of 'condemning what (the Lebanese radical Shiite movement) Hezbollah did.'
In Egypt, Bush is likely to hear the same concerns over Iran's 'calling the shots' in key Arab questions: Iraq, Lebanon and the Palestinian issue, Arab diplomatic sources said.
Bush's plan for democracy in the region is unlikely to be high on the agenda of his talks in Egypt.
Bush's initial enthusiasm and what seemed to be a firm commitment to prodding democratic reforms in the Middle East have faded.
Human rights activists in the region have ceased to pin hopes on a strong US backing of pro-democracy movements in the region.
Egypt, a country where democratic reforms lie in tatters, is a strong ally of the US.
Bush is expected to thank Mubarak for his unwavering efforts to broker a ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas.
On the Middle East peace front, most analysts say the prospects for significant progress towards a final agreement between Israel and the Palestinians are slim.
With only eight months left in office, Bush is unlikely to achieve a major breakthrough.
On his second trip, and probably his last, to the Middle East, Bush has so far achieved nothing. The trip has been largely ceremonial.
During his talks in Saudi Arabia on Friday, Bush failed to get the oil-rich kingdom to help reduce pressures on oil prices, which are hurting the US economy.
During his January trip to the kingdom, Bush's request for an oil output increase was politely turned down.
During talks over oil on Friday, discussions were 'friendly,' Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal said.
'He (Bush) didn't punch any tables or shout at anybody. I think he was satisfied,' al-Faisal said.
The Saudis argue that any output increase was unlikely to push prices down.
Last week, a group of Democrats in the US Senate introduced a resolution to block a multimillion-dollar arms deal with Saudi Arabia unless the kingdom increases oil production to curb price hikes.
The Saudis will get US assistance in the development of a nuclear programme for peaceful purposes under an agreement that was signed on Friday.
COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Middle East
- 1. Jerusalem prelate tells Arab Spring youth to have confidence
- 2. More than 100 killed in Syria ahead of ceasefire deadline
- 3. At least 43 killed in Syria, despite UN criticism
- 4. 19 killed in Syria as ceasefire deadline approaches
- 5. Pilgrims flock to Jerusalem for Easter, Passover
Older Talkback
page: 1
page: 1
IranianMay 17th, 2008 - 13:55:31
Support for Israel is garnered under false pretenses and enforced through coercive tactics. Americans should consider the effect of these strong-arm tactics on American’s public life. A small but powerful lobby has had an inordinate influence on the executive and legislative branches of the government, on the media, and on American’s public culture. Neither a former president nor Nobel Peace Prize winner like Jimmy Carter, or establishment professors from prestigious universities like John Mearsheimer (University of Chicago) and Stephen Walt (Harvard University), are immune from charges of anti-semitism if they question Israel’s (The cancer cell) policies. These assaults on the personal integrity of people who express non-mainstream political views have had a profoundly corrosive effect on free speech and public debate. Members of Congress of both parties accept pro-zionist’s political action committee money and in return, they support and initiate legislation in support of cancer cell, Israel. Both the public and the media have been trained to accept without question the unseemly spectacle of presidential candidates and elected officials who swear allegiance to a foreign country, as though this should inspire the trust of U.S. voters. Zionist’s illegal policies toward Palestinians and its neighbors have been the subject of more than 65 U.N. resolutions. Israel the cancer cell, routinely ignores General Assembly and Security Council resolutions, and its intransigence is defended by the United States. Supporting zionists puts the United States at odds with most of the people of the world, and it also means that the U.S. government grows accustomed to defending violations of international law. Yet United States is not above the law. Pro-zionist’s organizations and individuals have led the campaign promoting anti-Arab and anti-Muslim bigotry in United States and elsewhere. Generalizations and smears that would be easily identified as bigotry if African Americans or Latinos were the subject trigger no objections when they are made about Arabs and Muslims. Palestinians in growing numbers are demanding equal rights for all residents of Mandate Palestine. Americans can hardly oppose this demand while at the same time claiming to be a beacon of freedom and democracy for all peoples.
Report this comment