Middle East News
Obama's "undivided" Jerusalem talk draws fire amid Bush-Olmert meet
Jun 4, 2008, 21:55 GMT
Washington - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama provoked a flurry of reaction Wednesday by touting Jerusalem as the 'undivided' capital of Israel, going further than the current administration of President George W Bush who was holding talks with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert at the White House.
Obama, speaking before an Israeli lobby group in Washington, said any future Palestinian state must be 'contiguous and cohesive' but rejected East Jerusalem as the capital of that state.
'Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided,' Obama told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), one day after clinching the Democratic Party's nomination for president.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas criticized the remarks later Wednesday. He said there would be no peaceful solution to the Middle East conflict without a resolution of the status of Jerusalem, which both sides claim as their capital.
Israel captured East Jerusalem in 1967 and later annexed the region - a move that remains unrecognized by a majority in the international community.
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack also distanced the US government from Obama's remarks, saying any final decisions on the toughest issues in the peace talks were for Israel and the Palestinians to make on their own.
'It is for the parties to resolve these issues. And we are going to continue to do what we believe is right in terms of ... helping to bring about peace, without respect to presidential politics,' McCormack said.
Obama's comments came as Bush and Olmert held talks on the peace process and the wider Middle East at the White House. Bush said the world must consider Iran a threat to peace in the region as Olmert was expected to press the US on stepping up efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
'Iran is an existential threat to peace. It is very important for the world to take the Iranian threat seriously,' Bush said in brief comments at the White House soon after Olmert's arrival.
Olmert called Iran the 'main threat to all of us' and said he welcomed Bush's commitment to Israel during his visit to the region last month.
The two leaders were also set to discuss political instability in Lebanon and Israel's ongoing peace talks with Syria, revealed in May, which Olmert said 'may lead to pull out Syria from the axis of evil.'
Israeli media reports ahead of the meeting said Olmert would ask Bush to step up US and international action against Iran and prepare for a possible military strike against its nuclear facilities.
Olmert himself told the gathering of AIPAC Tuesday night that international sanctions against Iran must be strengthened.
'International economic and political sanctions on Iran, as crucial as they may be, are only an initial step, and must be dramatically increased,' he said.
Israel views Iran as its main existential threat, given Tehran's nuclear drive and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's often-repeated statements that the Jewish state should be wiped off the map.
Iran says it is only seeking civilian nuclear energy and denies it has attentions of acquiring atomic weapons.
Obama also pledged tough carrot-and-stick diplomacy against Iran in order to defend Israeli and US interests telling AIPAC there was 'no greater threat' to Israel than Iran.
Obama said he wanted to correct misunderstandings that he would be soft on Iran and threatened consequences if Iran refuses to stop nuclear development, stop supporting terrorism in the region and above all, stop threatening Israel.
COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Middle East
- 1. Jerusalem prelate tells Arab Spring youth to have confidence
- 2. More than 100 killed in Syria ahead of ceasefire deadline
- 3. At least 43 killed in Syria, despite UN criticism
- 4. 19 killed in Syria as ceasefire deadline approaches
- 5. Pilgrims flock to Jerusalem for Easter, Passover
Older Talkback
page: 1
Obama proved today in his speech before AIPAC that it is a myth to consider him a man of great principle. Obama complimented and expressed support for the continued war crimes and human rights violations of Israeli Jews against the Palestinians. Infact, Obama went a step further to prove that he is a best friend of Israel by approving Israel's
theft of East Jerusalem, which is a violation of all UN resolutions. If Obama wins, the US and world simply will simply have another dishonest broker to join others on the worlds stage to help make life more difficult for poor people and weaker countries.
I really believed that Barack Obama was a wise person with a belief in fairness and justice. What a big disappointment!!!!!
thats really really really really really weird, have we been duped by a superior modified manchurian candidate ?.....soma indeed, a remix on 'yes we can', was this a misquote???
The more zionist you are, thee more votes you have in America. I CHALLENGE EVERY READER TO PRODUCE THE NAME OF ONE, JUST ONE PERSON IN EURO-AMERICA, WHO TALKED AGAINST THE ZIONIST ENTITY AND WON ANY ELECTIONS!!!!
Dwight D. Eisenhower
I used to rally all my friends to Obamas cause now I will ask all of them not to vote for him. He has just validated the gross human rights abuses of Israel(which even some Israleis recognise).
Change isn't coming with Obama in my view,only talk.
'Change isn't coming with Obama in my view,only talk.'
LOL....
I agree with the sentiments expressed here. I was an enthusiastic supporter of Obama. With his AIPAC statements, he has revealed himself as inexperienced to say the least. It is one thing to express support for Israel but to lay down policy in direct contrast to what the peace process is attempting to do is an outrage. No one in the world recognizes Israel hold over all of Jerusalem. He has effectively shattered future peace talks and undermined Abbas who is a Palestinian moderate. With these statements, he has helped the extremists by giving hopelessness to a very legitimate cause. He has out Bushed Bush and offers business as usual.
page: 1

Yaakov SullivanJun 4th, 2008 - 23:08:08
Israel must let homosexuals have a civil marriage. As a gay Catholic Jewish actor I protest israel and declare an Academic boycott against israeli zionists
Report this comment