South Asia Features
Facts and figures on ISAF mission in Afghanistan
Oct 24, 2007, 17:51 GMT
Noordwijk, the Netherlands - The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission in Afghanistan was established by the United Nations Security Council on December 20, 2001.
The Security Council, pressed by Washington, adopted resolution 1386 as a means of responding to the global terrorist threat following the September 11 attacks against the United States.
On December 9, 2003, NATO assumed control of ISAF and in October of that year, the UN authorized its expansion beyond Kabul, the Afghan capital.
The mission, NATO's first outside Europe, is open-ended. And no one is quite sure how long it will last.
Its official objective is to 'conduct military operations in the assigned area of operations to assist the Government of Afghanistan in the establishment and maintenance of a safe and secure environment with full engagement of Afghan National Security Forces, in order to extend government authority and influence, thereby facilitating Afghanistan's reconstruction and contributing to regional stability.'
So far, the mission has consisted of five phases. The first phase - expansion to the north of Kabul - was completed in October 2004. ISAF forces then took up position in the west and then the south, where the worst of the fighting has and is still taking place.
According to reports, a total of 644 coalition coalition forces have died fighting the Talibans in Afghanistan on behalf of ISAF or the US-led Enduring Freedom Operation. Of these, nearly 300 are American. Thousands of Afghan civilians have also lost their lives.
All 26 NATO member states, plus a further 12 non-NATO countries, contribute to ISAF in some form or other.
Latest figures provided by NATO put the total number of troops at its disposal at 41,144. This figure includes Afghan forces - which NATO calls 'National Support Elements'.
The United States are by far the biggest single contributor with 15,108 soldiers. American ISAF forces are mostly based in eastern Afghanistan, around Kabul, and in the south.
The second biggest contributor is Britain, with 7,740 soldiers. The British are based in Lashkar Gah, a city in the southern Helmand province.
Some of the worst fighting has taken place around Kandahar, a city in the south where Canadian troops are stationed.
Germany is the third-largest single contributor. But its 3,155 soldiers are stationed in the more peaceful northern part of Afghanistan.
Italy's 2,395 soldiers are also based in a relatively quiet area west of Kabul.
The smallest single contributors are Austria and Switzerland, with three and two soldiers respectively. Georgia has yet to deploy its troops.
ISAF's current commander is US General Dan K. McNeill. The mission's Afghan headquarters are in Kabul.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in South Asia
- 1. Sri Lanka leftist party says leader, activist are abducted
- 2. US agrees to let Afghan forces take lead in night raids
- 3. India, Pakistan leaders want better ties
- 4. Pilot killed in crash of Bangladesh Air Force jet
- 5. Pakistani president visits India for lunch meeting, prayers
Older Talkback
page: 1
'You could think that they might rethink their strategy of 'demanding' to a combination of 'ask nicely' and 'Thats why we need to fight' but nope. '
'Demand' is the newspapers word, not the USA's.
'Forget any demands of further help unless you have a new government. ;)'
Get out of NATO then, parasite. You signed your name to the treaty and enjoyed it's protection, now when it is time to give something back you whine and hide. Useless.
page: 1

MariuszjOct 25th, 2007 - 10:24:49
I still dont get what they are complaining about.
Remembering that this entire operation was the USA's baby right from the beginning , there is nothing wrong with the fact that they carry the main share.
Sometimes their officials argue as if this was a NATO operation right from the beginning. It wasnt. It started with a USA lonesome cowboy act and they did not consult their NATO partners on it either. Now they seem to think that all carry the same responsibility. Thats wrong.
THEY did not catch Bin Laden, THEY transfered troops out of country prematurely and enabled the re-rise of the Taliban with that in the first place.
And THEY complain that others do something wrong.
They are in no position that would justify this.
They started it and then NATO came in on their demand. They should be glad for what they get as the participating countries already operate against the will of a majority of their publics. A lot of the 'so called lazy' europeans politicicans are risking their political careers to be with you at all.
You could think that they might rethink their strategy of 'demanding' to a combination of 'ask nicely' and 'Thats why we need to fight' but nope.
Forget any demands of further help unless you have a new government. ;)
More soldiers are needed ? No problem, just restart conscripting in the U.S and you will have more than enough for Iraq and Afghanistan together. Oh wait....you cant do this as public opinion would not accept that and it might trigger a dilemma similar to the Vietnam one with REALLY big protests.
Report this comment