South Asia News
British troop reinforcements expected in Afghanistan (Roundup)
Feb 23, 2007, 14:59 GMT
London - Britain is expected to deploy more than 1,000 extra troops in Afghanistan for a planned 'spring offensive' against Taliban forces in what experts say is proof of a shift in strategy in the country's commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan.
'After a long and bloody year' in Afghanistan, and 47 troops killed, the British government was clearly shifting the emphasis of its military conflict involvement from Iraq to Afghanistan, experts said.
Earlier this week, Prime Minister Tony Blair announced that 1,600 soldiers would be recalled from southern Iraq in the next few months, and that troop levels in the country could 'fall below 5,000' later this year.
Britain currently has 7,100 servicemen-and women in southern Iraq. With the new Afghanistan deployment, expected to be confirmed by the government on Monday, figures there will approach 7,000.
Detailed plans are due to be announced by Defence Secretary Des Browne in parliament Monday.
The NATO alliance currently has some 35,000 troops in the country, including 5,600 British troops, mainly deployed in the troubled southern Helmand province.
Conservative defence spokesman Liam Fox Friday criticized the lack of response by some NATO members to an appeal for larger contributions, made at the alliance's summit in Riga last December.
Fox said the appeal had fallen on deaf ears. 'Those troops should be coming from countries such as Germany, France, Italy and Spain who have so far not shown the adequate resolve to be part of a full NATO complement in Afghanistan,' he told the BBC.
'Too many of our European partners are now pocketing the NATO security guarantee but leaving UK taxpayers and the UK military to carry the cost.'
The Guardian said the extra British commitment would cost the government 250 million pounds (487 million dollars).
Military commanders have long warned that British forces were 'too overstretched' carrying out duties in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
Commander in Afghanistan had been 'screaming for more troops,' said a BBC report.
Britain has recently revamped its operations in Afghanistan to put most manpower into Helmand province.
South-west Afghanistan was proving a 'stubborn nut to crack,' said defence expert Thomas Withington of the Centre for Defence Studies.
'Many answers lie in deploying more troops and having more equipment on the ground, but they also lie in securing the border areas,' he said.
But what was really required was a is a two-pronged strategy, to ensure those two things could become a reality, said Withington.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in South Asia
- 1. Sri Lanka leftist party says leader, activist are abducted
- 2. US agrees to let Afghan forces take lead in night raids
- 3. India, Pakistan leaders want better ties
- 4. Pilot killed in crash of Bangladesh Air Force jet
- 5. Pakistani president visits India for lunch meeting, prayers
Older Talkback
page: 1
When you have time against you defeat is anything but certain. That's what British military is facing. From Kosovo to Afghanistan, the British army is streached. With recruitment shortages and funding shortages, it has become an hostage to lack of politcal will solve its current problem, it gets into deeper problems thanks to egoistic polical master, Mr Blair. Another 1000 soldiers into a Afghan theatre what for ? Victory cetrainly not, not with these kind of half hearted measures late in the day. It's an inhospitable terrain that sucked the USSR into a quagmire, 5 years after NATO's venture the same fate may be waiting for it. Perhaps the next British prime minister will listen to the counsel of his Generals.
page: 1

Jim McKenzieFeb 23rd, 2007 - 16:10:53
With the imminent announcement of a further 1000 British troops required for deployment in Afghanistan small wonder Blair is so keen for the withdrawal of 1600 troops from Iraq who, after a brief respite will no doubt require retraining for yet another type of combat. Yes, six months will be about right, Blair will by then be just a bad memory, leaving others to clean up the mess he has made of everything he has touched.
Report this comment