South Asia News
Pakistan's spy agency supporting terrorism "is not new" says Karzai
Aug 10, 2008, 9:31 GMT
Kabul - Afghan President Hamid Karzai repeated allegations Sunday that Pakistan's secret service was supporting the Taliban and their terrorist allies in fight against Afghan and international forces in his country, saying, 'it is not something new.'
Karzai, speaking at press conference at his fortified presidential place in Kabul, accused Pakistan's secret agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), for providing support to Taliban and their al- Qaeda associates in the fighting in Afghanistan.
'The ISI involvement with terrorism is not something new,' the president said, referring to the agency's alleged hands in the July 7 bombing at the Indian embassy in Kabul that killed at least 54 people, including two Indian diplomats.
Officials from Indian government and the US authorities have also hinted that ISI had helped the planning of the deadly attack, a claim Islamabad vehemently denies.
'Their (ISI) involvement may have been new for others,' the president said, adding that his government had shared its concerns regarding ISI's support for militants, international communities and countries in the region 'for a long time in the past.'
Karzai said that Pakistani soldiers helped Taliban militants to reach to power in 1996 and they still had planned to keep Afghanistan as their 'strategic depth' and install their 'puppet government'.
'We are ready to die for another one thousands years, but we don't want slavery,' Karzai said, but stated that his government was ready to start a new round of talks with Pakistan.
'We want to live in peace and harmony with each other,' the president said, adding, 'It is not for the benefit of anyone to raise a snake, because it can turn anytime and bite its owner.'
The relations between the two US allies on the war against terrorism have been on downward spiral, with Afghan officials accusing Islamabad of not doing enough to stop cross-border infiltration by militants from inside Pakistan.
Officials from the US-led coalition and NATO forces that together have around 70,000 troops in the country have recently openly said that Taliban-led militants were given safe havens in tribal areas of Pakistan, where they receive training, equipment and ideological instruction.
In order to overcome the bloody insurgency in the war-torn Afghanistan, Karzai said that he had always advised his international military allies to stop fighting the militants in Afghan villages and instead focus on 'source of terrorism.'
Pakistan so far has strongly rejected allowing international military troops in Afghanistan to cross over into Pakistani territory to pursue militants. It says it has deployed around 100,000 troops on its border with Afghanistan to clamp down on insurgents operating in the area.

COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in South Asia
- 1. Sri Lanka leftist party says leader, activist are abducted
- 2. US agrees to let Afghan forces take lead in night raids
- 3. India, Pakistan leaders want better ties
- 4. Pilot killed in crash of Bangladesh Air Force jet
- 5. Pakistani president visits India for lunch meeting, prayers
Older Talkback
page: 1
page: 1


scott ryanAug 10th, 2008 - 11:27:35
I don’t believe 1 word of what they say,, the terrorist would of new what was going to happen.
Pakistan said they had to attack because of what has been happening in the tribal regain, and presser from America.
Its funny, as fast as they go in, they pull out, every time.
Every time you will see them go in just for show.
they go in, then pull out, just to look like they did something, but new they where always going to pull out.
They have rockets, helicopters, jet fighters, the best weapons, but can not do any think.
that’s funny, if the Americans went in they would win easy, the only reason they are losing, is because the terrorist run of then come back, as soon as they try to fight in big numbers, they get killed big time.
Pakistan is not even trying to beat them.
You have air support, you can not loss.
What, they can defend them self’s against India in a massive war, but when it comes to the tribal region with the terrorist with not jet fighters / tanks / helicopter/ nuclear bombs they lose, ball shit ball shit.
If America went into the tribal area the war would be won.
Report this comment