Indian and Pakistani leaders move to diffuse tensions (Roundup)

KKDec 27th, 2008 - 15:12:47

'Pakistan Friday moved some of its troops from its eastern border to redeploy along the western border with India'

This is incorrect. Pakistan Shares its 'eastern' border with India, not the 'western' border.

Report this comment

PP TALWARDec 27th, 2008 - 16:52:06

It is strange that Pakistan being in the habit of always hitting india below the belt, misusing India's generosity and magnanimity towards Pakistan, of late it has whipped up war hysteria against India by mobilising its armed forces and puting them on high alert on Indo-Pak border in Punjab, J&K and Rajasthan. To add to it, Pakistan has paid no heed to India's demand of taking action against Pakisani, so called non state actors and dismantelling terrorist training camps on is soil, also handing over to india 50 wanted terrorist of Indian origin living in Pakistan. On top of all this, Pakistan is now threatening india of dire consequences in the event of an Indo-Pak war. In the past, Pakistan had fought three wars with India and every time it had faced humiliating defeat at the hands of valiant Indian armed forces.

Report this comment

Sean, Santa BarbaraDec 28th, 2008 - 04:01:55

Wow... PP Talwar... sounds like a pretty biased comment there... let me guess you're indian?

Seriously Pakistan was defeated three times by India? Only a Indian text book would have said that. Pretty obvious your Indian. The rest of the world can see that India lost 2 of the 3. I know it a point of pride, and I've seen the arguments that Indians have with Pakistanis, but I'm sorry. Kashmir was in Indias complete possession at the start every inch of land lost to Pkaistan is a loss, I can see by a map that there quite a few inches of land lost.

I would actually like to see another war between India and Pakistan again. Keep in mind that Indias military has shifted it's styles they have gone from a strong battle to the end force to becoming a conventinial technology based military.

The US a military hundreds time stronger then India (you'll probably argue this too, 'Indian Pride') is having a hard time fighting an un conventiianal force, what makes you think that a military like India has a chance at a un- conventianal force hundreds of times stronger then Afghanistan / Iraq.

It's a funny thing; facts they seem to ruin ones pride.

Lebanon lost ten times as many people then did Israel during their war, and yet Lebanon is the winner, why?

Same applies to you Indian

Report this comment