BinnyDec 14th, 2006 - 16:40:02

Very good article - We will never know what really happened.

B.T.W, I'm really impressed with monstersandcritics.com new website layout. Superb work!

Report this comment

JohnDec 14th, 2006 - 16:43:45

Wait 50 years for the facts

Report this comment

Ian - UKDec 14th, 2006 - 16:52:42

The truth will never come out! One BIG cover up.

Report this comment

George wilsonDec 14th, 2006 - 16:55:57

someone somewere knows what really happened, but us the general public will never know the real truth.I personally believe a conspiracy plays a part, as i believe happened with Rod Hulls fatal fall whilst fixing his tv ariel a few years later.
George

Report this comment

Thomas,LondonDec 14th, 2006 - 16:57:28

Make Sure Of This Lord Stevens Is Part Of The Establishment Even Though Retired
If This Enquiry Was Given More Independance The Outcome Would Probably Have
Been Different.
There Are Many Questions Lord Steven Has Left In The Air,This Smacks Of Coverup
Along With Conivance Of French And british Intelligence,Notice There Is Little
Said About The Americans Poking Thier Arogant Noses In.

Report this comment

William S. WilsonDec 14th, 2006 - 17:17:51

The mystery of Diana is the mystery of her parentage. She does not resemble her father or her siblings. If DNA tests are impossible, then photographs of her mother in the year before Diana's conception should be searched for a man with a nose resembling Diana's. Suppose a young woman grew up in the household of a wealthy father whom she could not be certain was her father? Might that not set her on the road toward that Paris which has a history which includes murder of royalty? See current listings of films, The Queen, and Marie Antoinette.

Report this comment

DewiDec 14th, 2006 - 17:58:03

I've seen no alternative scenario as to what really happened.

Was the plan for the Fiat Uno to drive the Mercedes off the road, resulting in the certain deaths of the occupants?

I'm very open minded, but haven't been presented with an alternative. The drunk driver/accident scenario works for me. Sadly it happens every day to ordinary people.
I'd love to see a similarly in-depth enquiry into 9/11.

Report this comment

P.HayesDec 14th, 2006 - 18:11:37

Perhaps now we could use the 10 detectives who have wasted their time and our money to find the murderer of 5 young women in Ipswich instead of investigating ridiculous fairy tales about three people who died in a car accident partly because they were not wearing seat belts and partly because the driver was drunk and being harrassed by uncrupulous photographers.
Its time for Al Fayed to apolgise to the Duke of Edinburgh and the Prince of Wales for his allegations against them and the so-called British establishment which he used to be so keen to join.

Report this comment

kitDec 14th, 2006 - 19:24:05

they were going 100 miles per hour,
weren't wearing seat belts, driver was drunk.
how is that a conspiracy?
get over it.
eveyone's just gotta bring in the muslim factor these days.

Report this comment

Jim GarrisonDec 15th, 2006 - 15:24:40

The other side of the story (what i've heard anyway) is that the car that Diana arrievd in was different then the car they left in. The theory is that M16 changed the car with one that was controlled by remote control. The seatbelts were probably broken as well. Then they controlled the car from the fiat uno and slammed the car into a pillar. Not to mention there were men spotted examining the car after the crash. Read the article here...

http://express.lineone.net/news_detail.html?sku=496

Report this comment