UK News
Deaths of Diana and Dodi al-Fayed were 'unlawful killing' (Roundup)
Apr 7, 2008, 16:34 GMT

The jury from the Coroner\'s inquest into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed enter the Pont de l\'Alma tunnel in Paris where the Mercedes the couple were travelling in crashed, 08 October 2007. EPA/CATHAL MCNAUGHTON/POOL
London - A British jury ruled Monday that Princess Diana and her lover Dodi al-Fayed were unlawfully killed through the gross negligence of their driver and the photographers who pursued them when their Mercedes crashed in Paris on August 31, 1997.
The majority verdict by a jury of six women and five men was seen as an emphatic rejection of claims by Dodi's father, Egyptian multi-millionaire Mohammed al-Fayed, that Diana and his son died in a staged accident engineered by Britain's secret services.
But al-Fayed, in a statement that reflected his anger, said he was 'disappointed' at the ruling which would come as a blow to his 'many million supporters' around the world.
In typical unrepenting fashion, he insisted that Diana and his son were murdered while 'at their happiest' after a yachting holiday in the summer of 1997.
'My character and beliefs have been on trial,' said al-Fayed, 74, who also hinted that he believed a second car was involved in the crash.
The ruling came at the end of a six-month inquest headed by Judge Thomas Scott Baker, who said he wanted to draw a line 'once and for all' under the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the couple's death.
Mohammed al-Fayed, who owns Harrod's department store in London, was seen leaving the Royal Courts in London Monday with a 'face of thunder' Monday, clearly disappointed at the latest twist in his 10-year fight to 'uncover the truth,' commentators said.
The jury ruled that the speed and manner in which the Mercedes car was driven by Henri Paul, the French driver employed at al-Fayed's Ritz Hotel in Paris, and his 'impaired judgement' due to excessive drinking, as well as the behaviour of pursuing photographers, were responsible for the unlawful killing, which equates to manslaughter.
The jury had heard 'compelling evidence' that Paul, who also died in the crash, had been drinking heavily that night and was driving at twice the speed limit through the Alma tunnel in Paris when he crashed.
In a majority verdict agreed by nine of the jurors, the jury concluded that the photographers and their drivers were 'recklessly 'racing the Mercedes' and drove so close to it that Paul had no freedom to move.
The fact that Diana and Dodi were not wearing seatbelts was also a factor in the crash, the jury ruled.
The jury, which heard more than 250 witnesses, travelled to Paris during the inquest, which is estimated to have cost up to 10 million pounds (20 million dollars).
In his summing-up last week, Scott Baker dismissed the possibility of a murder plot, telling the jury there was no evidence that the couple died in a 'staged accident.'
In December 2006, a London Metropolitan Police inquiry concluded that Diana and Dodi died as a result of an accident when their car crashed into a pillar in the Alma tunnel in Paris more than 10 years ago.
An earlier French inquiry also ruled that the crash was an accident caused by Paul's drinking.
COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in UK
- 1. Cambridge beat Oxford in 158th Boat Race after midway halt
- 2. Gas flare at Total's North Sea platform self-extinguishes
- 3. A myth turns 100: Titanic still fascinates world
- 4. Source of North Sea platform gas leak located, says Total
- 5. Efforts under way to stop gas leak on North Sea platform
Older Talkback
page: 1
WHO was it said this concerning the faked Henri Paul blood tests: 'It's an affront to any scientist.' ????
... Why, of ALL people, Lord Justice Scott Baker himself did! ... Now WHO is going to rub out that statement of 31st January 2007 at The Royal Courts of Justice?
WHOEVER covers the facts is guilty of the SAME crime of MURDER!
CrabbyGolightly.com says, 'Her Beauty Frozen In Time, Diana is Finally Protected From the Tabloids. Lara Flynn Boyle Can't Say the Same'
IT DOESN'T SEEM POSSIBLE THAT IN THE 10 YEARS SINCE PRINCESS DIANA'S TRAGIC DEATH INSIDE A PARIS TUNNEL that tabloid editors could have become crueler. But I'd make the case they have.
As Britain wraps up its six-month investigation into whether the royals conspired to kill the former wife of Prince Charles, the world revisits the fairy tale-gone-awry of a young girl who married her prince. I remember vividly my own personal shock when the news broke that Princess Diana had died in a car accident on August 31, 1997 fleeing papparazzi with her beau of the moment, Dodi al-Fayed. I also remember the callous thought that ran through my head soon afterwards: that the beautiful princess was better off dead. After all, a picture-perfect princess doesn't come marred with scars. And it would have been painful to have watched Diana's power, her hold on the public's imagination, slip away.
page: 1


BRIGHTRAVENApr 7th, 2008 - 17:25:37
... Regarding the faked blood tests of Henri Paul, Lord Justice Scott Baker said on 31st January: 'It's an affront to any scientist'
... This result of 'unlawful killing' is an affront to any honest,sane person on the planet!
Report this comment