US Features
It's the Bill and Hillary show for 2008
By Tony Czuczka Jul 4, 2007, 11:00 GMT
On the Web
Similar articles
- Opinion polls: Obama faces humiliating defeat in mid-term elections (correction)
- Thousands 'Rally to Restore Sanity' in Washington
- Republican in-fighting as voters pick candidates in 7 states
- Obama selects chief of staff, to meet Bush on Monday (Roundup)
- Tributes after Obama's victory, transition begins (Roundup)
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. Actress Susan Sarandon funds table tennis for New York schools
- 2. Romney lags behind a surging Santorum in US polls
- 3. Whitney Houston to be buried Saturday in small family funeral
- 4. Obama, Democrats get Republican raspberries for Valentine's Day
- 5. Obama calls for quick passage of payroll tax holiday extension
Older Talkback
page: 1
Aide: Senator, we've got next weeks itinerary done, the speaking tour and our appearences set up. Your break schedule and recess schedule as well.
Hillary: Fine. Whats Next?
Aide: well...er...it's you-know-who..Senator...
Hillary:Aw F--k...when...?
Aide: He's outside, Ma'am...
Hillary: Goddamn it, He's only supposed to show up when I call him! How'd he know?
Aide: ...read the polls...I can't really say Senator...he just shows up when he need money or you need help...
Hillary: Send him in, and then come in five minutes later...you know...
Bill: Hi Hon! Who's the Aide. She seems nahce! Cute dress too...
Hillary: Shut up!Put her clothes back on dickhead. She's married, as if that had any effect! What are you here for, another lamp in the head?
Bill: Well Hon, my sixth sense, or in mahy case, seventh sense says ya all gonna need some o my magic, reel sooon...
Hillary: Yeah, sooon! Listen, hide the accent until we get to Alabama, meet some black folk or something, OK?
Bill: well, sure hon...
Hillary: Listen, that black guy has got his hands in my pants and we've gotta deal him out.
Bill; Hon, it's the trifecta...beat him straight up, slime him or marry him...well...not REALLY marry him...
Hillary: Cut th shit dildo, I'm serious. I need some options here and I need them now.
Bill: Gee Hon, no need t git nasty onmy ass, I'm hep'in too!
Hillary: look, we get out the FBI records, we borrow from the chinese and russians, get Sandy the Berglar pimpin, get George Stephanopolis to pull out the spoon in his nose, go on the hunt at the Clinton National Broadcasting Co(CNBC) do whatever, but we gotta deal him out in the next 90 days fatboy!
Bill: Look Hon, ya git yoursef sumpin on his Coke habit, a floosy in th sheets, or make a marriage babe! God knows th blacks are not gonna roll on him!
Hillary: You get yourself out there hon. I'll send Britany Spears, and Hallie Berry with you if that'll help, but th brothers gotta roll. The white boy, he's toast.
Bill: Gee Hon, that's kinda cold.
Hillary: F--k him! He couldn't beat Bush in a bad year! Now, he wants another try! You feed him the hemlock, alright? I need results romeo, and if givin you a stable will help, you can pound our way to victory boy, just get it done.
Bill: No need t be nasty girlfirend...I'm on th job! By th way, will Josh Stone be comin along?
Hillary or Obama ?
2008 US presidential race should be very interesting and it will have an impact not only on United States but also on whole world where world affairs including peace is concerned. Result of Hillary or Obama will have a pivotal effect probably involving an immediate change in the corridors of American history. World peace will be determined by the election. Destiny of American people depend on it. Economic recovery depends on it . Super power strengthen depends on it.
White or Black or Woman it doesn’t matter, both have Democratic spirits, also both are qualify for presidential candidate or president of America. But a country or a nation can dance milk and honey only when his leader ship is in the favorable period of life cycle of leaders concerned. Who will win is a challenge to astrology ? Who should win is an important political matter ?
It is depth- study, a philosophy resembling a modern political science report covering the prediction of on-going 2008 presidential election.
According to Hillary and Bill Clinton charts I have courage to report that both are astrologically in good shape. Under such circumstances Democrats party woman leadership would contribute towards the peace and stability of the world and betterment of super power strengthen. Between July 31st 2007 to December 2007 Hillary will become more popular and will raise some multimillion dollars more than Obama.. According to Obama’s biography he was born on August 4th 1961 Honolulu Hawaii. In case he was born between ( 06:00 am to 8:00 pm.). Hillary will surely be riding high for the next president.
Despite the above instance, if nature deviates and Obama wins, it would not be wrong to predict that the next president of US will be Republican.
My Astro-political point of view without letting myself be influenced by religions, racial and political discriminations and hatred.
Bella Liberty
I wish everyone would go to the Dead and the Clinton's web sight, there are many , just to see just how many of their very close friends are now 'Dead' and the death tool is still climbing
Bloomburg is going to run too from independent ticket just to make her lose. America is not ready for a realist, sincere person as yet.
Here's the question on my mind. If we elect Hillary Clinton, will we be electing her or Bill? According to the constitution Bill is not allowed a third term. If you argue, as the Clintons did the last two times they ran for the White House, that we are getting a two-for, aren't we getting the same two-for for the third time?
It seems to me that there is a genuine Constitutional challenge brewing here.
Two,two,two turds in one
Let's hope Hillary wins - it would be great to see an intelligent person in the White House again - one who doesn't stutter and stammer over trying to read the notes someone wrote, much less understand them - and the 2 for 1 would be even better. Obama probably needs some more experience, otherwise he would bring a lot to the table, but..........alas, this country won't elect a woman or black regardless of what so many say. A woman seems too threatening to all those 'good old boys', and a black would bring the racist out in the rest! As for the 2 for 1, you can darn well bet the Clintons aren't the first ones!
The wannabe playwrite is back!
another novel from sp4
word is if bush can start a war with iran he gets another term.
is this true?
Not only no, but 'Hell, no!' He's out.
thanks alot had me worried there
The Billary insists that if she knew then what she knows now that she would have voted against the invasion of Iraq.
So now I wonder if she will change her mind about staying Iraq upon seeing this video:
//video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6916812079755110706&hl=en
Of course, someone might have to force her to sit down and watch it. I understand that she's rather busy at the moment. I hope the other presidential candidates will take the time to watch it as well. It is an egregious error to ignore one's enemy when he speaks.
Hillary Rodham had the foresight to marry Bill Clinton who had the skill anddetermination to become famous. Hillary also was shrewd enough to stay with him through horrible public humiliation. She has lots of experience, but none of it qualifies her to be President.
The libs are living in a fantasy dreamworld of their memories of Kennedy's Camelot and Clinton's Camealot.
If they really want Bill back, they should use their millions to get the law changed so he can run again.
If she competes against Obama she will loose all the magic she and Bill have spun around their myth and will end up like Gore, on the sideshow circuit.
Actually, just the opposite is true. Hillary got Bll into the statehouse. She was the breadwinner. She got him up and running for the White House bid. Go read 'Bloodsport'
This guy even steals his wife's thunder. You have to admire a huckster like him. He's the best, the grifter extrodinaire!
I made Hillary out to be a cold Baracuda. Do you think that's the right character for her? Bill's character is more like a game show host, with a little sociopath throw in.
By all means, opine!
the way so-called 'men' keep knocking Hillary. Could it be she is too intimidating and intelligent for them? She won't win nor will Obama. The corporate world wants another Bush puppet -someone with a blank slate - not someone intelligent with a mind of their own!
Those pesky voters! They just can't see the genius of Hillary! The poor ignorant masses fail to spot that shining star of womanhood.
But, pray tell, could it be the FBI records scandal? The Sandy Bergler money machine? The Vince Foster debacle? Whitewater? The law office records shred? The bogus commodity trades?
Those darn voters! They are so unreasonable!
As stated - intimidated men!
No.
The fact is any man, barring Alan Alda, doesn't want a mega-bitch for President. Even the worst KKK skinhead biker dude would vote for Obama before he lets the most crooked, vindictive, provincial, elitist, self serving, finger-in-the-air libnazi bitch from hell be the president. The most telling fact was the utter disinterest at her last speaking engagement. Folks talking aloud to their friends, etc.
The fact is, the dems want a pliable, scared president to insert their special interest judges, and apparatachicks into positions where the Soros machne can control the government. Obama represents an unstable element, for sure.
You describe just what the Republicans wanted and got in Bush! And I agree with the intimidation thing - it is sounding loud and clear in most of the postings!
I think it sounds more like the Noharness/SP4 show!
Oh, well hell! May as well add a little fuel to the fire:
//online.wsj.com/article/SB118372769027759227.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
And, here's a little more fuel:
//blogcentral.jpost.com/index.php?cat_id=4&blog_id=73&blog_post_id=1280 #anchor1
Anyone know what the principle difference between John McCain and Hillary Clinton is? McCain looks better in pants.
big time!
when someone doesn't have anything better to remark about, they criticize a woman's looks and appearance? That doesn't seem to happen with the many dog-ugly men in the public eye!
Yeah, I'm SO intimidated I think I'll beat my momma right after finish beating my wife. Maybe I'll slap my sister around a little while I'm at it.
I mean, if you're gonna be found guilty, you may as well be good and guilty, right?
Why, you are so thick that I think I'll go choke that stupid cat while I'm in the mood. I just hate fuzzy purring things.
No, the republicans voted for what they WANTED, but Bush, even if he lacks a brain, has a BACKBONE!
BIG mistake, huh? Ask his political opponents. Kerry-the-genius. Gore the internet inventor, Richards-the-lush (Gore too!). They tried to bamboozle their way into office and got bitch slapped by a real politician.
God, if only he could run against Hillary. I'd buy tickets!
That's enough to make me vomit!
Being intimidated and being an abuser aren't exactly in the same catagory!
Well, I thought I'd go ahead and beat 'em to the punch. That was going to be the next accusation. Of course, it just became clear today that the Billary is having a difficult time attracting the male vote among independents and some Demmies, so I'm sure this is what provoked those silly accusations in the first place.
That's fine. Accuse all you want. I am not intimidated by Hillary. The problem I have with her is that I don't share her views on a number of issues and I dislike her style. If you are inclined to think of me as being intimidated by her, be my guest, but it makes about as much sense as accusing me of being a wife beater and general misogynist.
That was a generalization regarding the male population being intimidated by a woman running for President - not a personal vendetta, but...........if the shoe fits, wear it; if not, get on with your life! You know as well as I do that there are many men who would not vote for a woman regardless of her ability or that they even like her. The same is true of a black person. It's a macho, good-old-boy thing with a lot of men. Also, I'm not particularly saying Hlllary is the best person for the job. Everyone who is running deserves respect and attention to what they stand for in order for the public to make a half-way good decision, unlike the last election might I add!
Okay, fine, just be advised that I have indeed listened to Mrs. Clinton and I have listened to her husband and he wasn't all that bad as a President, to tell you the truth. His hands were tied by the extreme left in his party, just a Republicans find themselves hampered by the extreme 'right' in their party, but he did fairly well. Congress stopped him from doing the worst he could have done and he did show a little courage when it was needed.
Does that mean I want Hillary Clinton in the White House? No. I don't like her politics and she has already 'served' two terms. I think it is a real bad idea to pull this kind of stunt. It violates the spirit of the Constitution if not the letter. Same deal for the Bushbaby. I didn't vote for him, either.
I don't like Hillary, for her politics. I especially don't like her for her personal vendetta's on some of Bush's nominees, but that's politics. Nonetheless, what goes around, comes around.
I wonder how long before Bill gets caught with another woman?
And what does that have to do with anything? Aren't most men doing someone other than their wives anyway?
Is there going to be any candidate worth voting for? Of course ANYONE is going to look good next to W which could be a problem. No one seems to be touching Obama with a 10 foot pole with much criticism - hmmmmm.
Come on guys,let's face it .The two biggest problems for your country are yet to be discovered by the larger part of the population.A hint,it is not terrorism .Another hint ,every year one them is already making more casualties than the attack on the twin towers ?Hmmmm that fits too much problems .Let us eliminate guncontrol out of the equation,we had that before .What is left,let me see...Healthcare ?
Could be ?Nothing comes out of the Wgite House concerning the sorry state of it .So it is healthcare then .
Let me see the other one .HHHmmmm,wildfires in California,inundations in Oklahoma and Texas,healthwaves...could it be global warming ?No ,not possible ,it does not exist for the White House .Oh but wait a minute ,so did healthcare .So then it is the other problem looming at the horizon .In fact it is the biggest chalenge in the history of mankind .
Without a changed attitude of the voters for your next president ,things will turn into a disaster for the world population.Twice a mandate of gour years will mean the potential end of the very existence of your own nature and population,period .
Consider the different stance of yout two currents of political thinking in comtemporary politics .Which current spent time on these issues ?
Now carefully read the ravings of SP4 which will invariably follow any criticism towards your present administration .Then decide ,distrust anybody throwing mud and offering nothing else .
RE:'Come on guys,let's face it .The two biggest problems for your country are yet to be discovered by the larger part of the population.A hint,it is not terrorism .Another hint ,every year one them is already making more casualties than the attack on the twin towers ?Hmmmm that fits too much problems .Let us eliminate guncontrol out of the equation,we had that before .What is left,let me see...Healthcare ?Could be ?Nothing comes out of the Wgite House concerning the sorry state of it .So it is healthcare then .'
Surprise! It is still automobile accidents, just as it has been for years and years.
Let me see the other one .HHHmmmm,wildfires in California,inundations in Oklahoma and Texas,healthwaves...could it be global warming ?No ,not possible ,it does not exist for the White House .Oh but wait a minute ,so did healthcare .So then it is the other problem looming at the horizon .In fact it is the biggest chalenge in the history of mankind .
Without a changed attitude of the voters for your next president ,things will turn into a disaster for the world population.Twice a mandate of gour years will mean the potential end of the very existence of your own nature and population,period .'
Surprise again, Tonny. The US is ahead of every country in actually doing something on this so-called 'problem' despite the fact that they are non-solutions to a non-problem. You are only upset because we did not sign those stupid treaties that would have gutted our economy. I will give you partial credit, I do think we are not building enough nuclear power plants, and we should be converting over to all diesel engines in our automobiles and light trucks, but the Dear Speaker and Senators Boxer and Feinstein dislike diesels so we are having a little problem doing things right. Beyond that, we are already leading the way and we will soon be cleaner than the EU ever imagined possible.
RE:'Consider the different stance of yout two currents of political thinking in comtemporary politics .Which current spent time on these issues ?
Now carefully read the ravings of SP4 which will invariably follow any criticism towards your present administration .Then decide ,distrust anybody throwing mud and offering nothing else .'
It is pretty damned clear from all of this that you are truly ignorant on anything but your own socialist/communist agenda, Tonny. You know nothing of how American politics actually works. You cannot distinguish between the political posturing and the actual doing.
What did Albert Gore do while he was in the US Senate? He advocated a 'carbon tax' that he he knew damned good and well had no chance of getting out of committee, then he turned right around with the rest of them and bitched about high gasoline prices. You want Americans to stop burning so much fuel? Raise the prices on the fuel. That works. The rest is posturing and bullshit.
You want to reduce health care costs? Undo this Frankensteinian monster of a health care system put together by our politicians and let Americans buy their medicines from abroad. Prices will go down of their own accord. These are obvious and easily implemented solutions, but what do we get? More posturing and regulation based on nonsense.
page: 1
Your Talkback on this Story