US Features
Americans rethink lethal injections for condemned
Oct 17, 2007, 10:11 GMT
Washington - Nevada this week joined more than a dozen US states in putting off executions because of increasing doubts about lethal injections and the amount of pain suffered by condemned prisoners.
In the Nevada case, the prisoner, William Patrick Castillo, was actually willing to go forward with the execution, but an appeal by the American Civil Liberties Union prompted the state's supreme court late Monday to postpone all executions for another 20 days, media reports said.
Ruling on complaints by two prisoners in Kentucky recently, the US Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on methods of execution - the first such deliberations in more than 125 years.
Meanwhile, the man who created the formula for lethal injections is expressing doubt about the method as it undergoes a thorough examination in the US legal system.
'It may be time to change it,' said Dr. Jay Chapman in a recent interview with CNN. 'There are many problems that can arise.'
Chapman, a forensic pathologist and formerly chief medical examiner in Oklahoma, developed the three drug-combination in the 1970s after being asked to find an alternative to the firing squad.
The three drugs are an anaesthetic to render the inmate unconscious, a paralytic to stop the inmate's breathing and a drug to stop the heart.
The basic criticism of the procedure has been that the first drug may not completely anesthetize all inmates, and if that's the case, then the prisoner, who is not completely unconscious after the first drug, will likely feel the asphyxiation caused by the second drug, which paralyzes all muscles, including those needed to breathe.
Chapman has said over past years that there may be other drugs available that would use faster-working anaesthetics. Chapman, who supports the death penalty, said in the interview that simplest method of execution is the guillotine.
'And I'm not at all opposed to bringing it back. The person's head is cut off and that's the end of it,' he said.
Heads hardly will begin to roll in US execution chambers, but the use of lethal injection in its current form could soon end. The US Supreme Court is expected to decide by next summer whether lethal injection is a type of cruel and unusual punishment barred by the constitution.
The court has issued a ruling on the question of methods of execution only once, declaring death by firing squad constitutional in 1878.
About 100 years later, firing squad was still being used - specifically, in 1976, in the death of Gary Gilmore in Utah, the first prisoner to be executed in the US following the reintroduction of the death penalty in 1976.
Having the choice of electric chair or firing squad, Gilmore picked the latter.
Chapman and his colleagues at the Oklahoma state medical examiner's office considered both methods barbarian and developed the lethal injection method, which Chapman says is a sound if not perfect method that works if administered competently.
In the years following Gilmore's execution, lethal injection was adopted by 37 states and used in 928 of the 1,099 executions carried out in the US since 1976.
Doctors warned in 2005 that lethal injection often was linked with extreme pain. In many cases the anaesthesia dosage was too little to ensure the inmate lost consciousness, according to a study published in the British medical magazine Lancet based on autopsies done on the bodies of executed prisoners.
Since then further examinations have confirmed the suspicion that some prisoners remain conscious, but unable to speak, after receiving the anaesthetic. They slowly suffocate, feeling the pain, but unable to cry out.
In 2006, Florida prisoner Angel Nieves, 55, suffered for 34 minutes before expiring. An autopsy report found the lethal injection needle had missed the main blood vessel in Diaz's arm and was instead inserted into arm tissue. Then-Florida Governor Jeb Bush ordered suspension of executions and an investigation into the use of lethal injections.
The same year, it took 90 minutes to execute Joseph Clark in Ohio. Witnesses reported that Clark groaned and struggled, telling prison officials the anaesthetic wasn't taking effect and begging for 'something by mouth' to end it all.
All this has led to a full-blown discussion over the best method of execution. Michael Rushford of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which supports the death penalty, has advocated the use of carbon monoxide. Rushford described it is 'simple, fast and painless.'
Experts expect lethal injection to remain the method most widely used, but with the legal requirement that when it is used, no unnecessary pain is caused.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-AgenturCOMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in US
- 1. Mitt Romney Addresses Tea Party Summit Pictures
- 2. Seven injured as US Navy plane crashes into apartments
- 3. At least three injured in US Navy plane crash
- 4. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, others to face death penalty trial
- 5. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, four others to face death penalty trial
Older Talkback
page: 1
is why we lost the war in iraq.
don't want to hurt the bad guys you know.
i too just puked.
'and this
is why we lost the war in iraq.'
We haven't lost the war in Iraq.
And we aren't winning it either. Maybe the guillotine would be a good alternative???
How about an old fashioned bullet? Who gives a sh*t if the killer suffers anyway? Look what the killer did! And in quite a few cases, the victim was raped, terrorized, or tortured in some other way before dying. What's wrong with the killer suffereing? Damn bleeding hearts will feel sorry for any loser nowadays won't they?
the old nail their nuts to a stump and leave a rusty knife
Wrong people being deported. Deport the criminals and keep all Mexicans!
and I don't have to rethink any form of execution. I do feel the method of execution should be based on a case by case severity of the crime.
Adopt the rather intriguing Mississippi method tried and tested some years ago ; -
Drag the bastards behind a truck until there is nothing left, avoids undertakers and wasteful burials, it also gives the local wildlife a treat.
You truly are a mad bunch of barbarians.
I'd bet you are all good Christians too.
Your views make you no better than the men on death row who are usually black, poor and uneducated and quite often innocent.
You are the same bunch of christians who accuse muslims of being savages.
No criminal was ever dragged in Mississippi. It was an innocent man in Texas, and those that did it were themselves executed for it, or are slated to be executed.
Second, most americans back capital punishment, even while christian organizations oppose it.
Third, the purpose of lethal injections was supposed to be that it was more humane than either the gas chamber or the electric chair.
Fourth, I could care less what foreigners think of our criminal justice system, the fairest in the world.
We do have a custodial responsibility to have the most humane executions possible. I don't know anyone who disagree's with that.
Taking a sermon from the Irish on civility, given your history, is like you telling Michael Jordan how to play hoops.
Please elaborate on your vast knowledge of Irish history.
Just because your granny is a plastic paddy does not make you a leading authority on anything irish.
You can lead a whoretoculture but you cant make her think.
Brian, I forgive your ancestors terrorism against the Brits, since we both threw off the same colonial yoke of oppression, but don't try and insinuate you are better for some reason. How many british officials and military men did your plain clothed soldiers murder to win your sovereignty?
Why don't you detail us out on how you came to think of yourself as an expert on American culture. Was it wearing american jeans or drinking coke, or listening to rock and roll? Was it the weekly marxist gatherings, or one of the endless pub crawls, your cultures one indisputable contribution to american culture.
Tell us, Brian, where was it you developed such a hate for one of the few nations who actually reveres Irish heritage and culture??????
We haven't lost the war in Iraq.
Oh thanks for your forgiveness, Ill be able to sleep now.
Killing a couple of brits who butchered raped and pillaged their way through the world and committed acts of ethnic cleansing on my country for 800 years is not an act of terrorism. Its always the aggressor and the imperialist who use the word terrorist before they can be accused of being just that.
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom-fighter.
But in the 30 year war which they call the troubles only a couple of thousand people died. about the same amount who die from gun shot wounds in new york each year and we are the crazies?.
Ireland was voted the third safest country in the world and one of the best places to bring up kids.
I dont drink coke or wear your jeans or buy any american products. I dont allow my children to do so either and even though they are all young they are all intelligent enough to not want to.
Anyway thanks for your forgiveness, but how long will america have to wait for the worlds forgiveness for their present acts of terrorism (or as you see it freedom fighting) (the ex-most powerful nation on earth against one of the least developed)Heroes bleedin heroes.
page: 1
WHATEVER NEXT ?Oct 17th, 2007 - 11:02:01
I have never heard such claptrap in all my life - POSTPONING LETHAL INJECTION BECAUSE THEY MAY CAUSE PAIN TO A KILLER !!!!!!!!! The whole suggestion is so disgusting, I have just puked up.
Americans must be going balmy - what about the pain caused to the VICTIM by that piece of shit laying on the gurney ? The killer should be put against a wall and shot - THAT is very quick and probably the best way to dispose of vermin. It only costs a few cents for a dozen cartridges - good ain't it.
I would not give a shit if the killer was left in agony for a week.
Report this comment