US Features
Still no Republican frontrunner as McCain picks up speed
Jan 20, 2008, 8:13 GMT
On the Web
Similar articles
- Opinion polls: Obama faces humiliating defeat in mid-term elections (correction)
- Thousands 'Rally to Restore Sanity' in Washington
- Republican in-fighting as voters pick candidates in 7 states
- Obama selects chief of staff, to meet Bush on Monday (Roundup)
- Tributes after Obama's victory, transition begins (Roundup)
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. PREVIEW: Stars, fans and cameras set for Whitney Houston's funeral
- 2. Hollywood's sad story: Stars ruined by prescription drugs
- 3. Actress Susan Sarandon funds table tennis for New York schools
- 4. Romney lags behind a surging Santorum in US polls
- 5. Whitney Houston to be buried Saturday in small family funeral
Older Talkback
page: 1
Presidential Candidate for the 2012 elections in America
NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM
Judah Ben-Hur
Ambassador
The American Republic
Diplomatic Mission: North America
McCain look like he belongs in the house of wax?
What a mess this country is in if McCain is put into office. For some reason, we just keep voting in psychos.
Perhaps, before shooting your mouth off, you should look at Johnny's resume'. Also, go read his book, and then decide.
He's a Naval Acadamy grad, served in combat in Vietnam, captured and released.
He's been a federal legislator for at least 20 years, and passed some of the most contentious legislation, taking it in the chest, that risk averse Hillary's and Obama's run from like the wind, while preening themselves for higher office.
He has harangued the Pentagon over countless spending priorities, and pushed reform to the tune of billions of dollars. In each case, he has taken a political hit.
I'm not a big fan of John MCCain's politics, but there is not a man and certainly no WOMAN who deserves the shot more. In each case, he has come out and told it like it is, the consequences be damned. You would think this would earn him some cred, but dickheads like you cannot add two and two.
'Perhaps, before shooting your mouth off, you should look at Johnny's resume'.'
What's 50 years of service to the USA versus Obama's lengthy resume of... a term in the senate. Or Hillary's lengthy resume of... being someone's wife and the worst (jr) senator my state has. (That is saying something when you consider that the other one is Charles Schumer.)
'Also, go read his book, and then decide.'
As if they could read.
are a couple of sheep. McCain is a two timing, four-flushing, double-crossing, liar; and you two bought into his bullshit. He got shot down in Vietnam and he has you eating out of the palm of his hand and believing he should be president of the US. What children you are.
'are a couple of sheep. McCain is a two timing, four-flushing, double-crossing, liar; and you two bought into his bullshit. '
LOL!
'two timing, four-flushing, double-crossing'
Gee, someone had to go back to the 1930's to get their insult phraseology..
'Four-flushing'!!!! Why not call him a scoundrel and a cad!
That too.
RE:'are a couple of sheep. McCain is a two timing, four-flushing, double-crossing, liar; and you two bought into his bullshit. He got shot down in Vietnam and he has you eating out of the palm of his hand and believing he should be president of the US. What children you are.'
You're just upset because the M&C boards allows a genuine exchange of ideas and opinions. Why don't you go back to the Huffington Post where you can be happy?
I'm just not for McCain. I've known about him for a lot of years and I would hate to see him in the White house. He is not good for the USA.
Well, yeah, I'm a little upset I guess. Not with McCain, but with people like you who sing his praises without at least knowing about him.
the only thing his supporters read, was written by him.
See if you ca find a place where I have come out in support of John McCain.
'You're just upset because the M&C boards allows a genuine exchange of ideas and opinions. Why don't you go back to the Huffington Post where you can be happy?'
Yes, you may have your opinion as long as it does not differ from Noheadedness. If you opine anything else, then you are an idiot, moron, fool, have memory or mental problems etc.
His words may be important to his fellow Houston, Texas compatriots, but in the rest of the world, he is just another blathering bumkin.
Would McCain make a better candidate that multi-millionaire Romney - or maybe the lesser of two evils??
Sorry - I meant 'than' multi-millionaire Romney!
'Yes, you may have your opinion as long as it does not differ from Noheadedness. If you opine anything else, then you are an idiot, moron, fool, have memory or mental problems etc.'
So why do you insist on proving him right?
'His words may be important to his fellow Houston, Texas compatriots, but in the rest of the world, he is just another blathering bumkin.'
I am from New York City, does that entitle me to call you an idiot?
'I am from New York City, does that entitle me to call you an idiot?'
That would definitely be a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
'So why do you insist on proving him right?'
Exactly how did did that happen? Maybe in some sense of mind-numbness caused by the polluted atmosphere in New Yuck, your sentence is logical. But that is a very narrow paradigm, quite similar to the typical yankee's uneducated programmed 'thinking' mode.
Thirdly, coming from a metropolis you are definitely not a bumkin.
Have a nice day, fricking moron.
Why don't you guys consider fine tuning what could be a useful debate to the programs candidates present .You have a plagues health care system that accounts for the loss of ten thousands lives per year due poor functioning and people being banned access to it .Education can be improved ,it ought to be free for all,not subject to the wealth of your parents.THose are issues that create equal opportunities and rights for all americans .If you consider the incredible amount of money that has been spent on the Iraqi disaster ,you'll find out that all of it could have been easily financed with the money spent on weapons.You would still even have been able to provide decent housing for those that are homeless or living in slums .THose are more important issues in my eyes.Republicans offer nothing and so they concentrate on empty words such as 'leadership capacities' ,etc.Don't get fooled ,the issues of democracy is all of you.THe next stage in the republican campaign will be smear and slander ,dirty tricks if they see their chances of being elected deflated.THey did that to John Kerry (remember the sift boat campaign ? à and to Clinton (Just ask SP4 about that ...Hsu...Berger...) don't get sidetracked by smear or irrelevant issues,focus on your interests in all this .Can you use decent health care?
RE:'Why don't you guys consider fine tuning what could be a useful debate to the programs candidates present .You have a plagues health care system that accounts for the loss of ten thousands lives per year due poor functioning and people being banned access to it.'
Says who, Tonny? I agree that it is entirely possible, but statistically it is insignificant relative to our population. We lose about 40,000 people per year in automobile accidents, even with safest automobile designs ever produced. Practically speaking how much better can it get? Health care for most of is a good deal more expensive than we like, but the poor do get pretty good care here.
RE:'Education can be improved ,it ought to be free for all,not subject to the wealth of your parents. THose are issues that create equal opportunities and rights for all americans.'
Basic education, twelve years of it, is free and mandatory in every state of the union, Tonny. The system stopped performing well right after I graduated from high school and has continued to worsen despite billions of dollars being pumped into the system. Some of the problems causing the system to fail are not susceptible to the spending of more money. Very often, the problems lie with parents and local leadership. Also, I think the worst of these problems is that school administrators are unwilling to rid the schools of disruptive students.
RE:'If you consider the incredible amount of money that has been spent on the Iraqi disaster ,you'll find out that all of it could have been easily financed with the money spent on weapons.'
Actually, what you are talking about here is the money spent on a war, not just weapons. Was the war necessary? That really is debatable. When we went into Iraq the majority of Americans were FOR IT, but they expected the military to kick asses and then come home and not stay in Iraq for a protracted period of time, something Colin Powell had warned about during the first Persian Gulf War.
Would that money have been better spent on education, housing and other welfare programs? No, not really. The war has put us so far into debt that it is sickening.
RE:'You would still even have been able to provide decent housing for those that are homeless or living in slums.'
Had the federal government taken control of our southern border as it had promised to do back during the Reagen Administration, many of our social welfare troubles would be somewhere near being solved by now. The huge influx of immigrants has hurt us a good deal more than members of either political party want to admit. Both of them profit from the misery.
RE:'THose are more important issues in my eyes.Republicans offer nothing and so they concentrate on empty words such as 'leadership capacities' ,etc.Don't get fooled ,the issues of democracy is all of you. THe next stage in the republican campaign will be smear and slander ,dirty tricks if they see their chances of being elected deflated.THey did that to John Kerry (remember the sift boat campaign ? à and to Clinton (Just ask SP4 about that ...Hsu...Berger...) don't get sidetracked by smear or irrelevant issues,focus on your interests in all this.'
Oh, both parties do this same thing during every campaign. It is nothing new and both sides are really good at it. It is NOT just the Republicans who pull this crap. As for John Kerry, the swift boat campaign would not have hurt him one bit if people had liked him. Look at the BS Bill Clinton has gotten away with. People forgave his misbehavior because they liked him. Is that crazy? You're damned right it is, but that is how democracies work.
I'll give you another for instance. Look at how these boards work most of the time. Nearly a half to two-thirds of the exchanges here amount to little more than traded insults. There is no such thing as purity in politics and there never will be. Any argument about what politics should be or could be will likely be correct, but suffers from the failure to recognize the nature of the materials with which politics are built--human beings.
So, if you want to argue against the Goopers on any subject, including health care, it is necessary to refute their ideas and claims. Simply dismissing said ideas as 'non-existent' or as being 'nothing to offer' really won't make the grade.
RE:'Yes, you may have your opinion as long as it does not differ from Noheadedness. If you opine anything else, then you are an idiot, moron, fool, have memory or mental problems etc.
His words may be important to his fellow Houston, Texas compatriots, but in the rest of the world, he is just another blathering bumkin.'
The only opinion you ever fully express on these boards is your opinion of me. How did I become so important to you? Aren't your ideas and opinions more important to you than I am? Why don't you try expressing them? Let others judge between what you and I think about the issues of the day.
Sure, if you express an opinion that I do not agree with I will argue against it, so may any number of other people. If the refutation makes you feel like a moron you must be wearing the hat because it fits. I don't go around calling people names, that's your long suit, not mine. It looks as though you prefer to try and bully people into agreeing with you rather than persuading them.
Rest assured, bullying will not work with me. I know how to make bullies miserable.
'I know how to make bullies miserable.' How do you do this, reveal the fact that not only are you wrong on most of your 'facts', but that you are in fact a cross-dressing right wing neo-con?
Notice Tonny's argument, after 7 years of hearing how crooked Bush, Cheney, and the Tooth Fairy are, he now wants to silence the speech on al of the Clintons pecadillos.
Wnat to debate the issues, instead of integrity? Be my guest!
Want a health care debate? Go see how health care fares in states where the dem lib cansidates live versus the bad old republicans.
New York has some of the highest insurance premiums in the US, and one of the lowest levels of insured. The libnazi cow towing to the Trial Lawyers has pump the price of health care to stratospheric levals and is NEVER mentioned by the libnazi press.
Now, we are supposed to believe that these lib chuckleheads have some kind of solution, while guys like Romney have been DOING on health care and succeeding, abeit to a small degree.
Don't like my repsonse? Go check out education: The dem libs have been sucking the heads of public ed for thirty years and it has stadily gotten worse. In fact, ever since the fed has goten into the ed business, it has declined. Need an ironclad example?
Washington DC - here is a region entirely funded by fed dollars and is a disgrace. In this case no one can blame a state for failure and the feds just keep pouring good money after bad. The result: the liberals are BEGGING for vouchers!
hahahahahahahahaha!
Fed Ed is dead. The only thing left is the funeral.
No, Tonny, the debate is legit and after 7 years of hearing about the big bad wolf Bush, we're going to highlight EVERY crooked shortcoming of Hillary and her minions. It was important to you, now it's important to ALL of you!
Re:' 'I know how to make bullies miserable.' How do you do this, reveal the fact that not only are you wrong on most of your 'facts', but that you are in fact a cross-dressing right wing neo-con?'
If I am wrong on my facts, you are doing a rather miserable job of pointing out my errors. As to how I make bullies miserable, I'll let you figure it out. Come to think of it, you may never figure it out. You seem to like pain and anger. If that is the case, I'll be happy to carry on with what I am doing.
'now it's important to ALL of you!'
How omniscient of him to see what is important to me. He is approaching the stature of No-awareness himself.
He says: 'The only opinion you ever fully express on these boards is your opinion of me. How did I become so important to you? Aren't your ideas and opinions more important to you than I am? Why don't you try expressing them?'
I do post items that are germane to the topic. Nr. ego himself, Nohairness, rarely stays on topic and is merely an amusing little side-bar. As for making bullies miserable, you really must enjoy self-flagellation.
'I am from New York City, does that entitle me to call you an idiot?'
That would definitely be a case of the pot calling the kettle black. '
LOL, So you admit to being an idiot?
''So why do you insist on proving him right?'
Exactly how did did that happen?'
Well, if he is calling you a 'an idiot, moron, fool' and saying that you have 'memory or mental problems etc' and you pipe up idiotic, moronic commentary that is foolish, flaky and deranged you kind of prove his point.
' Maybe in some sense of mind-numbness caused by the polluted atmosphere in New Yuck'
LOL, never been here, eh?
'But that is a very narrow paradigm, quite similar to the typical yankee's uneducated programmed 'thinking' mode.'
Uneducated? LOL! Look, clown, you are embarrassing yourself here. You repeatedly demonstrate hat you can not give a counterargument to anything that anyone else says and you are not quick witted enough to be an interesting troll. Once again, if you want to play you would do well to attack the argument, not the person making it. Once you have destroyed it, then you have license to be insulting. As it stands now, you are just an idiot who whines that other people are saying something.
Look... Here is what you do:
SP4: 'Hello, I sunny days as opposed to cloudy ones.'
You: 'Blah blah, you just say that because you are a douche bag, blah blah think the way I think even though I haven't ventured an opinion, blah blah, some playground insult.' (Add in a few Non sequitur and some misused words where the 'blahs' are.)
Noharness: 'Sunny days are nice.'
You: 'You not nice no headlice and uneducated, everyone look at me now because I am an attention whore.'
You see, you just look like you were raised on a diet of lead paint chips.
Instead, you could try to argue that rain is necessary for crops or that you like to see rainbows or that you like to jump in puddles... whatever. Or you could even AGREE that sunny days are nice. That part is up to you. That requires 'reasoning'which is probably why you haven't been doing it. But do try.
Got it? This is our last crack at it so if you have any questions ask now.
Blather on, New Yucker. Your logic is faulty, your agument isn't even specious, and your thinking, in general, is smoggy. What is in your brain-pan, a soggy Quiche Lorraine?
Precisely where is your on-topic comment?
'Blather on, New Yucker.'
Aaah yes, I see it was pearls before swine. All that you are capable of is infantile retorts like that.
'Your logic is faulty,'
How, exactly so? Do explain.
'your agument isn't even specious,'
Thank you. Perhaps you should look some of these words up before you use them. Idiot.
'and your thinking,[sic] in general,[sic] is smoggy.'
You do love your verbal masturbation.
'What is in your brain-pan, a soggy Quiche Lorraine?'
So much for attacking the argument. I guess you are too stupid to do that.
'Precisely where is your on-topic comment?'
Right here:
'What's 50 years of service to the USA versus Obama's lengthy resume of... a term in the senate. Or Hillary's lengthy resume of... being someone's wife and the worst (jr) senator my state has. (That is saying something when you consider that the other one is Charles Schumer.)'
Do try and keep up, eh?
The use of (sic) is inappropriate. It is short for spelling in copy. There was nothing wrong with the spelling, unless you Yuckers spell things differently over there in yaya-land. You are one sic (sic) puppy, boy. Perhaps YOU should use a dictionary and have someone interpret the meanings in very, very simple words. Have a nice day, y'all.
Specious: having a false look of truth or genuineness.
I do believe that the person who is not a New Yucker, is correct when he says the N,Y.'s argument isn't even that. Yucky's post is specious.
'Or Hillary's lengthy resume of... being someone's wife and the worst (jr) senator my state has.'
What is wrong with being someone's wife? Do you have a thing against women? Do you like little boys?
As fot the 'worst (jr) senator', where is your proof of that, other than your spoonfed neocon programming? If you think she is bad, why don't you do something constructive with your life and run for Senator? The answer is quite simple - you don't have the guts or the gonads.
on topic post comes a little late, and only after he was caught out and challenged on the lack of it. Back-pedal, Yuckie, full steam astern.
'New Yuckies
on topic post comes a little late, and only after he was caught out and challenged on the lack of it. Back-pedal, Yuckie, full steam astern. '
First page you idiot, 3rd quote down... Boy, you are as sharp as a marble.
'Kenneth
Specious: having a false look of truth or genuineness'
So my argument did not have a false look of truth or genuineness...
Good.
That wasn't what I was aiming for you smart fellow.
That would be: 'SP4: No, it does not'
YOU are SPfool? no wonder there was an idiot in the woodwork.
Shuck and jive fool. You do the Noharness twist. Your latest posts were as New Yucker, and until caught out, you had posted nothing on topic.
'That wasn't what I was aiming for'
So what, exactly were you aiming at? Do you have a clue?
You also said this: 'This is our last crack at it so if you have any questions ask now.'
How many last cracks at you are there going to be? That sentence indicates that you were leaving. You are still here. Typical yank. Can't believe a word it says.
It syas: 'So my argument did not have a false look of truth or genuineness... '
What was said was he didn't even have that. So his argument was even less than specious. At that level we are getting down into pure bunk. Do you understand now, smog-head?
'What is wrong with being someone's wife?'
It does not qualify you to be president of the United States. Since you are undoubtedly too irrational to get or maintain a relationship with a man I am afraid that even if it were some kind of career stepping stone to the oval office you would still be disqualified for being an ignorant bi*ch.
' Do you have a thing against women?'
Heh...
'Do you like little boys? '
Nope, not 'little girls' either. Especially the irrational, childish, waste of time ones. You know the kind I mean, the ones who are so insecure that they have to hop on the bandwagon of OTHER peoples ideas but when it comes time to articulate any of their own they just revert to calling people neocons or other infantile names. Look, it is not Bush's fault you were too ugly to get asked to the prom.
'As fot[sic] the 'worst (jr) senator', where is your proof of that,''
My proof is that the only vote of importance that idiot has made was FOR the Iraq war. She has done NOTHING else of note in her career as senator. Normally senators try to bring in federal dollars to their constituency, she has lost them. Where is my other proof? Name a positive thing she has done for the state of New York... (I realize that would mean that you would have to use your brain, so I expect that question will lead to you spewing more kindergarten excrement.)
' other than your spoonfed[sic] neocon programming?'
LOL. Again, you have nothing to contribute so you revert back to your little buzz word. 'Neocon'.
' If you think she is bad, why don't you do something constructive with your life and run for Senator? '
Thanks anyway, I like the job I have now. You should try getting a job. You know... since you are too ignorant to have a relationship it might be a good outlet for your obvious frustration issues.
'The answer is quite simple - you don't have the guts or the gonads'
Aaah yes, You are such a little lady. No wonder you have nothing else to do other then follow SP4 around and whine like an idiot. Why don't you curl up with another carton of ice cream and pester noharness for saying something you charming, rational, oh so attractive little soul.
'That would be: 'SP4: No, it does not''
OOPs, You are correct, mine was #4. Congratulations. So here, once and for all, posted on Jan 20th, 2008 - 18:06:55 M&C time:
=================================================
Yes, read his book
'Perhaps, before shooting your mouth off, you should look at Johnny's resume'.'
What's 50 years of service to the USA versus Obama's lengthy resume of... a term in the senate. Or Hillary's lengthy resume of... being someone's wife and the worst (jr) senator my state has. (That is saying something when you consider that the other one is Charles Schumer.)
'Also, go read his book, and then decide.'
As if they could read.
==========================================
See, I started 'on topic'. I would ask you to point out where you posted anything on topic, but you are an idiot and I just don't care.
'How many last cracks at you are there going to be? That sentence indicates that you were leaving.'
Nope, that indicates that I was done trying to educate. Now I am free to treat you with the contempt that you deserve.
' Typical yank. Can't believe a word it says.'
What is this with this 'yank' stuff. You don't use British spelling. Are you just schizophrenic? It's fun to play pretend, isn't it?
What country do you call home. I have asked you this before but you are evidentially too ashamed of it to admit where you come from. Someone with your intellect would be a fine ambassador for whatever 3rd world sh*thole you represent.
Do tell! I would like to know which one of our foreign aid recipients needs it's child education budget increased.
'Since you are undoubtedly too irrational to get or maintain a relationship with a man'
'you would still be disqualified for being an ignorant bi*ch.'
'You are such a little lady... you charming, rational, oh so attractive little soul.'
I guess that he really, really likes men. Don't bend over in the shower, boys, Yucky is here.
'It syas:[sic] 'So my argument did not have a false look of truth or genuineness... ''
Syas?
'What was said was he didn't even have that.'
:-D
Who is 'he'? My argument? I didn't know arguments had a gender. Look, fool: Go out and learn what a 'double negative' is and then go out and learn elementary spelling. After you have done those basics you can start on learning how to string together a subject and predicate. Finally you can study how to integrate words like 'specious' in to an English language sentence to convey an idea. Then, and only then will you be qualified to give anyone tips on how to express themselves because as of now you are just demonstrating your ignorance in yet another field.
'What country do you call home. I have asked you this before '
None and no you haven't. Try telling the truth sometime, barebacker.
'I guess that he really, really likes men.'
You protest too much, It is a sign of insecurity. Afraid those impulses will get the best of you? Take it elsewhere Judy Garland fan, even if I was gay I could do better then an idiot like you.
My, my what a peulant little child Yucky is. He is really getting frustrated. It shows in his basic lack of understanding of grammatical and English language norms. But that is to be expected, for he was 'educated' in amerika, where they don't speak English, but american. Keep up the futile ad-womanem attack smog-head. You are too funny. This is more fun than planting IED's.
is so insecure he couldn't handle a real woman. He beshits himself for being just a 'man'.
'None and no you haven't.'
Aaah, as I said, you are too embarrassed to admit where you came from. Good.
'Try telling the truth sometime,'
So you don't remember this?
'Country-wise, depending on which source you use, there are up to 193 more to chose from. Even IF you could get my current IP from Monsters and Critics, you still wouldn't have MY IP. Waste your time, fool, try again.'
You are indeed a waste of time.
'Waste your time, fool, try again.'
No thanks, you are just a boring troll venting his impotent frustration on the internet. I don't blame you for being ashamed of your country, whatever it is is obviously so boring and inconsequential that your only say in world politics is to whine about what a country that actually counts does.
' barebacker.'
Again with the homosexual references. Look, no means no.
is soooo confused. In one post I'm a woman and in his latest I'm a man. He is so mixed up in his gender isues that he might as well be a eunuch.
No means no, unless you are yuckie, he is just being coy.
'My, my what a peulant[sic] little child Yucky is. '
Original as always... You get called a child, you come back with the most amazing retort...
'It shows in his basic lack of understanding of grammatical and English language norms. '
Where?
'But that is to be expected, for he was 'educated' in amerika, where they don't speak English, but american.'
LOL! Hey, at least I was educated. You have demonstrated conclusively that you can't answer the simplest question, defend any position or engage in a legitimate debate if your life depended on it. In other words, you have demonstrated that you are an idiot. One that is jealous of the USA by the way. Typical.
'Keep up the futile ad-womanem attack smog-head. '
I wouldn't dream of attacking a lady.
'This is more fun than planting IED's. '
As if, that would involve waddling off your couch.
'In one post I'm a woman and in his latest I'm a man.'
Hey, you are an idiot, that knows no gender.
'No means no, unless you are yuckie, he is just being coy. '
No, like I said, not interested in idiots. Especially dull idiots like you.
'No, like I said, not interested in idiots.'
In the interests of accuracy, you never did say that. But boys are different, right, yuckster?
Keep it up, you are soooo entertaining. Shuck and jive. Flip and flop.
Ride 'em, cowboy.
to insert a little sanity here...
The New Yorker says; ' Especially dull idiots like you.'
But he does seem to enjoy attempting to verbally duel with someone who is better at it than he is. The poor man doesn't seem to realize that he is unarmed.
After a word from our sponsors, we return to the match. Grab a beer or two, I don't think that this little tete a tete is over.
Let's review, moron. You were given an opportunity to engage in authentic discourse. You couldn't, you are simply too stupid. You were provided with a primer on how to engage in in a rational discussion. It was beyond your abilities. Since then it has degenerated in to you calling me, and I couldn't make this up if I wanted to: 'yuckie' which is just plain pathetic. (Just a wild guess here, but this isn't the first time you have been called 'pathetic' is it?)
You have whined like the spoiled child you are that SP4 and Noharness don't take you seriously. Guess what, you do not deserve to be taken seriously. You behave like an idiot. You whine that they shoot down your arguments? You do not make arguments. You don't have any ideas to attack. You are not even an amusing troll. 'Yuckie'? Come on, that is beyond infantile.
You have disgraced yourself at every descending level. I await you transitioning from infantile to embryonic...
Yes, I agree, yucky the neocon is bad and I am a totally different person who is really convincing and smart too.
Yucky, the neocon is not good or smart like me and I am not some morbidly obese kraft dinner eater who is resentful because we never do anything but live in their shadow.
And I just wanted to say that neocons are bad and I am not a retarded attention whore who never had an original idea in her big fat life. Good to see that even when there isn't a bandwagon to hop on I can create an imaginary one.
multiple personalities have shown up. Even with all those strangers floating around in his head, he is still so lonely that he has to go out on the web and attack people. When they give some of it back, he comes totally unglued.
Have a nice circle jerk with your friends. Come back in a few days when your meds take effect, IF you can find your way, that is. Have a nice relapse, Yuckie
'New yuckies..
multiple personalities have shown up.'
Just borrowing your obvious tactic.
'he is still so lonely that he has to go out on the web and attack people.'
Lonely, eh? Is that why you spew your inane drivel after everything SP4 or noharness posts here? Poor thing, attention starved. No wonder.
'Have a nice circle jerk with your friends'
Lol, You have shown that you can't win in the battle of ideas or even in the exchange of insults you witless whiner. Don't let the door hit you in that gigantic rear end of yours.
off base in all things he says. There was nothing here to win, but he wound up losing, anyway. He has shown everyone what a one dimension being he is.
Like his friends, whom he keeps mentioning, SP4 and Noharness, (as if they give him any credibility whatsoever), he doesn't have the where-with-all for intelligent discourse. I hope he enjoys his many delusions, starting with his 'victory.' Just like his cracked Liberty Bell, The Yucker rings hollow.
'New Yucker is off base in all things he says.'
I guess no one ever told you about 'categorical propositions.' (Or any other kind of logical syllogism for that matter.)
'There was nothing here to win, but he wound up losing, anyway.'
Nothing self contradictory there... Yup, you make so much sense...
'He has shown everyone what a one dimension being he is. '
Once again, since you haven't gotten it yet: You have been offered rational discourse. You have been provided with an example of how to conduct it, you have not been unable to provide an intelligent counterargument to anything here. The only thing you have shown yourself capable of doing is making a fool out of yourself with ever more infantile, sub playground, English as a second language insults. So how 'multidimensional' is that?
'Like his friends, whom he keeps mentioning, SP4 and Noharness,'
I have never met either one of them. SP4 and I have actually had some disagreements here. I just think it is pathetic that you can't engage them in normal discussion and you insist on making a fool out of yourself by sitting at your keyboard and hitting 'refresh' all day so you can write something agonizingly stupid after each SP4 post. If you want to get at him, break his argument. If you want to keep making a fool out of yourself keep mixing your metaphors, not addressing the issues and tossing out 3 year old mentality insults.
'as if they give him any credibility whatsoever'
I am not doing this for their validation. Are you here to get some 'credibility'? How many different ways can it be demonstrated to you that you are going about it the wrong way?
'he doesn't have the where-with-all for intelligent discourse'
LOL, It is all up for everyone to see. You have run like hell from having to rationally defend your positions. You aren't even TAKING positions anymore. Fine. If your ideas can't stand scrutiny maybe you should change your ideas. (By the way, THAT'S why I post here.)
' I hope he enjoys his many delusions, starting with his 'victory.''
Where did I say the word 'victory'? That was your word for my outcome here. :-D To be clear, you are a waste of time. I don't consider wasted time a victory.
'Just like his cracked Liberty Bell, The Yucker rings hollow. '
LOL, another tortured metaphor... Give it up fool.
the only thing tortured around here is your 'thinking', yucker. Goodbye and good luck with finding the right man. I'm sure that in New Yuck city there has to be someone that will fit in with you. Ciao, baby.
It is a simile, not a metaphor, you uneducated, pre-pubescent little twit.
After doing some research into what he was saying and references to past posts, it would appear that N.Y. is the web troll. It took a LOT of digging to find the stuff he so quickly threw out. He must have a log of his own posts cross referenced to each other. He then picks things and throws them to see if they stick. He has got to be an immature little cretin, particularly when he throws stuff like this, out of the blue: 'We own you.' The Newbie is just another egomaniacal troll like SP4 and Noharness - All bluff, bluster and B.S.
'Goodbye and good luck with finding the right man.'
I would wish the same to you but we both know there isnb't a hman being on earth that would put up with your stupidity.
'Ciao, baby.'
Yet you keep on ranting. I do hate long goodbyes.
'It is a simile, not a metaphor, you uneducated, pre-pubescent little twit.'
'Metaphor (from the Greek: metapherin) is language that directly compares seemingly unrelated subjects'
So, once again, you are provably wrong. Idiot.
'After doing some research into what he was saying'
Good, educate yourself.
'and references to past posts, it would appear that N.Y. is the web troll.'
LOL! How on earth could you have the audacity to call anyone else a web troll? 'THE' web troll. LOL!
' It took a LOT of digging to find the stuff he so quickly threw out.'
??? No, it did not. LOL! It took no effort to point out what a moron you are.
'He then picks things and throws them to see if they stick.'
??? Look... moron... once again, you were offered a genuine conversation but were too stupid to be able to engage in it. You were only capable of reverting back to trolling. The amusing thing is, you are too slow witted to even be a decent troll.
Hilarious posting!
page: 1
Your Talkback on this Story