US News
Obama takes first step toward 2008 presidential bid
Jan 16, 2007, 16:25 GMT
On the Web
Similar articles
- Democratic presidential candidate quits race
- Former Massachusetts governor starts 2008 White House bid (Roundup)
- Former Massachusetts governor declares 2008 White House bid
- Obama declares candidacy for US presidency in 2008
- Wild card Obama tests waters for 2008 presidential bid (Roundup)
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. Romney lags behind a surging Santorum in US polls
- 2. Whitney Houston to be buried Saturday in small family funeral
- 3. Obama, Democrats get Republican raspberries for Valentine's Day
- 4. Obama calls for quick passage of payroll tax holiday extension
- 5. Report: Director Oliver Stone's son converts to Islam
Older Talkback
page: 1
Someone new is certainly needed to lead the country. As someone who can't vote but is profoundly affected by US politics, I think Senator Obama appears to be a refreshing change from the current crop of fear mongers.
My husband and I are senior citizens who reside in Michigan. We are proud to be hopeful for the presidency of Orack Obama.
Only in America would the Democrats be thought of as 'left of center.' There's about as much diversity in American politics as there was in Soviet politics.
I am not usually an early adopter when it comes to politics. I am; however, in favor of Obama's bid for the presidency. After reading his books, paying close attention to his responses to spontaneous questions, and evaluating him on his ability to analyze an issue and formulate reasonably sound first impressions on matters, I find Obama to be a candidate of great consideration.
When Colin Powell was on the cusp of running, it was unanimous across the country that he was a shoe-in to win the presidency. The issue of America being 'ready for a viable Black candidate' as something that is soon to be well past us. Our nation is muti-cultural, passionate and understanding of what it takes to remain the pinnacle of global strength. This man is a new breed of politician; one that could very well be our nexus into a new era of government focus on American needs--not self-serving ones.
I would love to hear more from Senator Obama on the real issues facing our nation and have a high degree of confidence that he could navigate our nation into a position of global respect and stability that we have flirted with losing for going on 8 years.
Hilary should step aside and support him.
There is too much disdain for HC. She would make a great VP (some may say she already has) or Sec. of Health
Maybe, just maybe, there is hope that we can come out of the disastrous Bush years.
It would be fabolous to see Senator Barack Obama become the next President of the United States. A change of administration is definately needed as previous administrations have done little to enhance the image of the United States abroad.
Sure....a Harvard Law School attorney....pro-abortion....pro-gun control.....pro-affirmative action....slick....cocaine use history..Where do I sign up...Right!!!...Forget about it !!
The man may have what it takes. But senator you must not give in to this despotic behavior that has seemed to have plagued our nation into pressured silence and the overrunning of those with financial wealth,and racketeer influenced corruption techniques that seem to think they do not have to adhere to rule of law. Seal the borders, No amnesty for the illegal invasion forces, and do not become apathetic to their drive to destroy this nations very sovereignty. Good luck and god speed senator.
'Farthest from your mind is the thought of falling back, in fact, it isn'tt there at all. And so you dig your hole carefully, and deep, and wait.'
Unidentified US Soldier
Battle of Bastogne
WWII
We must not give in to despotism, for if we do then our 'Constitution' will fail.
Sincerely,
Silencedogood.
It is nice to see adults making valid points and posing reasonable arguments rather than igniting flame wars as see on other sites. This is good commentary.
I have read Obama's latest book. It seems to me to exgress what all Americans want. However, It also seems to me that it is don't do as I have done as a Senator. Just do as I have written--THAT MEANS US!The Senate Has only worked three days a week--for $165 thousand dollars a year. And how many vacations do they take a year? No they are doing a lot of blab in all the news--But the reports are non-binding. It seems to me that Bush has a tongue in cheek attitude when his picture is included in the report. So the Congress is once more screwing the American public. The Democratics are continuing to do the same business at the same old stand!!! When is Congress going to act? The people voted for what they want and left no doubt. I think that it is time for Senator Obama to quit the same fence sitting and start remembering that he is here to do what the American people want, not the American people are here to only pay $165 thousand dollars a year for nothing but the shaft that they always get.I have always favored the Democratic party over the Money mad Republican Party. But this time,get on with it! What we now have is a dictatorship!!! If Obama does not show far better signs of doing the people's wishes, my vote will go to someone else, even if I have to vote for myself!!!
I agree with you Lorraine about how our senate operates. It is abyssmal. Watching Senators speak to no one on the floor etc. The question is, who is responsible for this? What is clear is that we will ahve about 108 changes of the guard due to term limits in (is it?) 2008? Maybe now is the time for the American people to make their voices heard again so that the new crop doesn't take root in the old soil!
Lorraine, in two years we can fully change the House of Representatives once again. What if we were to focus our reasoning efforts into looking at candidates other than democratic or republican that will represent and bring true our constitutional representative 'REPUBLIC' and end this demeanor of us being an imperialistic democracy under the guise and formation of a sinister and despotic One(new)world order?
In my previous post this is what Senator Obama must overcome and rise above to be duly elected 'BY THE PEOPLE' for president of these United States. The man 'CAN DO' it if so chooses to, and he must really 'HEAR THE PEOPLE' and serve them well so as not to ever put this great nation in 'DIRE JEOPARDY OF DESPOTISM' again.
bout friggin time!.....nuff said....!....and yes i vote...
And in my most recent previous post. Ideologues such as John McCain and Ted Kennedy are heading us down this very dangerous path. We are not a democracy John!!!!! We are in fact a constitutional representative 'REPUBLIC'. Take you and your One(new)World Order Initiative Legion(followers or corrupted despotic wanting wolves in sheeps clothing) to another planet. It's done here.
As for Bill and Hillary. You better hop a ride with John & crew too. You too Kerry, but don't worry Bush and Co are going out on the end of our 'WE THE PEOPLES' foot. It's over........... The people know..............we are done with all of you. better pack up your fake money banks as well, or we'll take care of that too.
Sir,
You have a chance laid before you to make revolutionary history. That is if you're up for it? I as one american citizen believe that you are. Do not give in to apathy and do not sell out to the sinister and despotic new world order machine. You have friends if you stand firm in restoring and maintaining our constitutional representative republic. We together can succeed. We also ask that you carry that torch of light.
I happen to agree with silence do good on quite bit of what he said. however i would sure like to see Senator Obama run on his own or least as a libertarian. the democratic party doesn't deserve this man. We the people do.
Tom - Any political party that advocates redistribution of wealth, supports public funding of private goods and services (such as health care and retirement savings), and places more emphasis on equality of outcome than equality of opportunity, is left of center - regardless of in what country the party is active.
Senator Obama has been in public life/office for a very short period of time. He has virtually no track record and no international experience. He is charismatic and speaks well (alas something our current president sorely lacks) - but why do so many think that he has what it takes to be president of our country?
What has he done that makes anyone think he 'has what it takes'? ..and please, no comparatives (that means don't simply say - he can do better than so and so) - what is it OTHER than charisma and a few generic speaches where he carefully avoids difficult positions, that give any impression of his ability?
What do we know about Obama other then he is black?
I can't support someone till they give me some idea of
where they want to take the country. Cheap political
Rhetoric doesnt cut it. Give me details!
This article was interesting... but poorly written. Why should Barack Obama be ever-referred to as 'African-American Senator'? We don't see the other senators referred to as 'Caucasian Senator'. It's unnecessary and inflammatory.
Similarly, not referring to the Democratic party by name but instead as 'the left-of-centre' party seems to paint the opposition, the Republicans, as centrist, when the current administration is far, far right-of-centre. If anything, Obama is a centrist.
Thank you for your time.
Our Constitution is at stake, make no mistake about it. This man(though lacks political experience which is favorable)has not yet been corrupted by the despotic system that so much wants to destroy what most of us as citizens want so much to protect, but haven't really ever understood why. we are being recolonized at a rapid rate by the illegal invasion forces fully in effect. the reason for this is because of the accelerated growth of our technology and the ability of ppl being able to become more aware of whats happening around them. Thus the one(new) world order initiative has had to recklessy speed up their process as well to achieve their ultimate sinister objective. Our constitution stands in their way. they are scared to death of it and what it represents and they know that if it doesn't fail through the obvious despotic oppression taking place today. Then they will in fact lose control and power over the people. the constitution must be protected ladies and gentlemen and Obama has yet to be corrupted. Ronald Reagan was asked once after he was shot, what he wants. He replied 'World Peace'. We must protect the constitution and we need a president at the helm that hasn't been corrupted by the current despotic system of things. If we allow ourselves to fully accept despotism our constitution will most certainly fail. Our constitution is the only one like it in the world ladies and gentlemen. It's the only thing between us the good guys and them the bad guys. If you want peace we must protect the constitution.Though it is imperfect(as such the case with all of mans endeavours) it is our key weapon(along with knowledge) against the despotic system of things trying to control us. lets end it once and for all. We now have been given the upper hand here. Lets get it done.
Rhetoric is what will be used to try and disclaim my previous post, however the facts as seen today are most certainly undeniable.
If Mr. Obama stands any hope of winning this next election, he MUST vote NO on any amnesty and seal our borders so as to protect the sovereignty of this country. Who's that silencedogood?
A better question to ask instead of 'where does he want to take the country?' Will he protect the constitution and the constitutional representative republic it represents from both foreign and/or domestic threat of despotic destruction?' It's a tall order no doubt, and i believe he hasn't considered this part yet himself yet to this extent but he has one thing to make him fully aware of the path for which he is about to take..........us 'WE THE PEOPLE' not the sinister despotic one(new)world order machine. But first we all must be fully aware ourselves of the events truly taking place. For those who know shine the light for them, get everybody up to speed. Hold town and/or block meetings, rent halls, pool resources, barter if necessary, but make everyone that you can aware.
These are just just a few key links you might find of interest.
http://www.manews.org/1006razamoney.html
http://www.trilateral.org/projwork/tfrsums/tfr57.htm
http://www.trilateral.org/
http://www.nascocorridor.com
http://www.kcsmartport.com
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com
http://www.numbersusa.com
http://www.cis.org
These are a list of just a few sites you might want to check out and see for yourselves. Then truly look with you own eyes. If what they are doing is so good for everybody, then why didn't they just come right out and tell us all? carefully read thru everything here. It helps explain alot. I personally do not subscribe to their point of view. They were not forthcoming, nor were they honest with us about any of this.
P.S. pass these links on to everyone you know and/or care about.
Well.............It sure makes one see the picture. It also explains our total lack for rule of law within regards to the illegal immigration issue. We have our hands full. Thank you for the links by the way.
Here you go.
http://www.fuse.tv/videos/index.php?p=clip3773
SUPPORT NET NEUTRALITY.
Thank you.
I would love to see a contemporary definition of 'political experience'. Moreover, I would love to know who believes that emperical political experiences can only be gained via Washington D.C.? I question just how much of this 'political experience' we really want our future commanders-in-chief to possess? We gain our own relevant international experiences through our dealings nations and people from other nations.
How many of us here in these pages have even spent time anywhere other than America. Sure, there are those of you who have. And it is you that have the most relevant canvass upon which to construct your noteworthy arguments. However, do we think that a person of mixed race, particularly one that is Black, has no insight into international issues and concerns. Do we think that someone like this Senator, Mr. Obama, doesn't possess the intellect and political savvy to educate himself and the staff he'd assemble to grasp these issues?
Do we assume that every president we have elected in the past was highly politically experienced and possessed international political experience as well? I am just curious about these things, because it baffles me how we draw conclusions and make pointed assumptions through our own paradigms and convictions. Exactly how much international political experience did George W. Bush possess upon assuming the presidency? I ask out of ignorance--not to be smug and rhetorical.
Lastly, someone tell me what the perfect presidential cadidate would be? Give me details, on views, record, outlook etc.
You bring up some very relevant points. My response is this, first and foremost he or she must protect the constitution and 'Republic' for which it stands. He or she shall view redundancy as a key tool in matters dealing with foreign and/or domestic diplomacy issues and not as a mere hindrance. The constitution and the 'Republic' it represents shall always have precedence.
P.S. I have.;) The political experience as well as foreign relations experience he lacks(per say)offers us a candidate not yet corrupted(and hopefully will not be). but as seen so plainly throughout our constitution it shows to us how we should not trust our government. Our founding brethren had a serious distrust for government and it shows in the constitution. As seen today we should be able to understand why. That is one key element of why it is so imperative to protect the constitution of these United States. They told us within it that this would happen.
Speaking of redundancy, has anybody in here thought of a vice presidential candidate?
I would like to see Ron Paul as the vice president. Why not?
Instead of trying to give a laundry list of what I look for in a president (or any elected official) - the primary qualifier for me is experience.
What have they done so far in their life? Do they walk the walk or just talk? Have they had to face and deal with extremely difficult choices and how have they handled adverse situations?
No president governs alone. A close look at their friends and key advisers is also warranted. Many times, some insight can be gained by the associates we keep.
Honesty and integrity are the fundamental cornerstones that must be present. But those alone are not enough - experience is required.
You do not truly know a person until you see how they act/react in truly difficult situations. Only then, does their true character show.
Experience in making difficult choices? We've all had to make them. However i do agree with your ideology as it pertains to the measure of one's character. For establishing that point i must commend you.
I am thrilled that Obama has decided to use his God-given talents as a mission to lead our country once Bush is out. I will continue to write the Senator and my local Democratic committees in support of his decision. To those who way that he is too new and inexperienced, Martin Luther King was 35 when he was killed in his ministry as a memorial black leader.
John Kennedy, while coming from a family of politicians, had vision and insights for our country. In his inaughural speech, he challenged the citizens 'ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.' He too was young. He knew how to make use of the media and press to guide our country. The fact that he was Catholic was a low priority when voters looked at his other qualities.
He wasn't encouraging young men to sign up to go to a foreign land to kill or be killed.
Thanks people for the commentary. This has been some really good dialog and I am once again pleased that it can take place without piranah like attacks. Seems we as a people are so much smarter than we have been in a long time. With open minds and hearts focused on what is right, I am certain we can make progress.
Not one person here has been venemous or arrogant about their views or position. No one has had the tone that many minorities would have expected. It is nice to be wrong, and see preconceived notions taking a back seat to everyone's interest in good government.
This makes me hopeful that, this time, we won't be easily misled and can come out of this next race with a candidate that knows times are changing. I just want to see someone of substance and integrity get in there and do the best they can for us. I am open to a review of all the prospective cnadidates, and even taking a look at the ones I would have known nothing much about had it not been for my conversations with you folk.
Thanks for you time, and may the best candidate for our nation emerge and win!
I agree with Fabian!
Well it was many months ago that we began this disussion. And now, on the eve of yet another primary victory, Senator Obama has demonstrated what I suspected of him all along--that he is a viable candidate and one that is not just appealing to people of his own demogrpahic background.
It will be interesting to see if his machine can stick it to Clinton yet again. I for one am looking forward to it. I also offer a big nod to Huckabee for his ability to seize the debates in the manner that he has. very skillful and much needed.
Politics are not my game....but, I think if we elect a President that has 'Muselim' and 'Atheist' ties, we are in trouble!! Just because he is black, he will win a lot of votes, but America has to decide what is best for this country. Does the last name 'Obama' sound American.. Hell no!!
page: 1
Your Talkback on this Story