US News

US to press forward on missile defence despite Russian objections

Apr 4, 2007, 0:10 GMT

Washington - The United States will move forward with plans to install missile defences in Poland and the Czech Republic despite objections from the Russian government, a senior US defence official said Tuesday.

Undersecretary of Defence Eric Edelman said that the United States would prefer to work closely with Russia in deploying a system of 10 interceptors in Poland and a radar site in the Czech Republic, to protect against an Iranian ballistic missile threat, which could materialize in less than 10 years.

'I don't think, if for some reason we're unable to reach a commonly agreed way ahead, that we would want to accede to Russia being able to dictate what we do bilaterally with other countries, or what NATO does as an alliance,' Edelman said.

The estimated cost of the programme is 1.7 billion dollars, he said.

US plans, which still need the approval of the Polish and Czech governments, have angered Moscow and sparked fears in Europe of a revived, Cold-War-style arms race. The United States has played down those concerns, saying the system is designed against Iran's growing missile capability and poses no threat to Russia.

'We think the threat is one that (the Russians) face, as well as one that we face. In fact, they come within range of these missiles before we do,' said Edelman, who estimated Iran's missile technology will be 'mature' and capable of reaching the United States by 2015.

Edelman and other US officials have been in Europe recently, trying to counter political and public scepticism of missile defence as they prepare to negotiate with the Polish and Czech governments on building the systems.

The Pentagon believes the system could be fully functional around 2013 if negotiations can be completed quickly.

© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur


COMMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest Headlines in US

Older Talkback

page: 1 

NoharnessApr 4th, 2007 - 00:49:48

Why?

I have yet to hear or read a good reason for this.

Report this comment

Read My LipsApr 4th, 2007 - 01:38:25

Military industrial lobby, and the theoretical maintenance of invulnerable pre-emptive strike capability (subject to effectiveness, in practice).

Report this comment

notafoolApr 4th, 2007 - 02:30:48

Remote controlled missiles in Europe controlled by the US. They say defensive against who ? Yah right. Since when is any weapon only defensive. This will be US controlled weapons for any type of use and any target. Bush wars for world domination and oil appropriation.

Report this comment

WonderingApr 4th, 2007 - 03:29:35

The U.S. can install weapons wherever they want, but let another country even remotely suggest doing it, they are given ultimatums for instant removal????

Report this comment

Colonel KilgoreApr 4th, 2007 - 13:58:28

'The good guys always win - in the end...'

Report this comment

iamscaredApr 4th, 2007 - 16:38:35

What if Russian government decided to install the same stuffs in Venezuela.

Report this comment

Tau_SetiApr 4th, 2007 - 16:41:24

'Defense'? The USofA has proven that it is not interested in 'defense' by it's 'offensive' 'strike first' policy. Another reader asked the correct question: 'Why'? Missal batteries are a 'means to an end', it is not a 'why'. 'Motivation and intent' like so much here 'are temporary constructs created for the sake of appearances' ... the Art of War. All unfolds according to prophesy.

Report this comment

Alan Hurd UKApr 4th, 2007 - 18:10:25

TO Jamscared,Spot on mate nice comment.

Report this comment

AnswerManApr 4th, 2007 - 19:58:46

Bush proves once again that if you give him a mouth, he'll put his foot into it. On its face, the plan seems to have merit ... assuming he's talking about anti-missile missiles. But not long ago, someone (and his Secretary of State) warned the U.N. of supposed dual-use facilities and equipment. Even with our own sophisticated satellites, we could see a warhead on a missile ... but still could not tell if the warhead contained a defensive or offensive component. And if we can't tell the difference, why should we expect others to just take our word for it? And if we are quick to worry about dual-use, why shouldn't we expect others to be equally worried?

I'd like to send Bush a case of lollipops. At least he'd have something other than a foot to put in his mouth. And to those who believe his plan is wise, I should probably up the ante from lollipops ... sending them cases of all-day suckers.

Report this comment

SP4: Notice...Apr 5th, 2007 - 00:05:56

...that Russian Iranian nuke reactor progress slowed once the Polish interceptor issue was outed.

Since these are non-nuclear, they are no first strike weapon. Furthermore, they actually protect Russia, since any launch of rogue ICBM's intercepted, saves Russia the retaliation that would happen if Russian warheads landed anywhere.

Apparantly, Mr. Bush understands the issue just fine!

Report this comment

bobApr 5th, 2007 - 02:50:18

yah but sp4 doesn't understand a thing ..except tinfoil hats.
talk about stupid

Report this comment

AnswerManApr 22nd, 2007 - 20:49:31

Hands up ... all those who think George W. Bush is doing this as a 'favor' to Russia?

Report this comment

page: 1 

Follow Us

Follow M&C on Pinterest

Search

Custom Search

Also Check Out

Delta Goodrem opens up about Brian split

Delta Goodrem opens up about Brian split
Delta Goodrem said she 'didn't know how to get out' of her six and a half year relationship with Brian McFadden. ... more

Cynthia Nixon weds longtime partner

Cynthia Nixon weds longtime partner
Happy news for Cynthia Nixon and her longtime partner Christine Marinoni, parents of Max Ellington Nixon-Marinoni. The couple wed this weekend. ... more

David Beckham likes to bite Harper

David Beckham likes to bite Harper
David Beckham likes to bite his 10-month-old baby daughter, Harper, because she's so adorable. ... more

Jessica Biel is 'one of the guys'

Jessica Biel is one of the guys
Justin Timberlake's friends like his fiancee Jessica Biel because she's 'one of the guys', says his former *NSYNC bandmate Lance Bass. ... more

Lindsay Lohan pursued for 41k owed to tanning company

Lindsay Lohan pursued for 41k owed to tanning company
Lindsay Lohan still hasn't paid the $41,031 she owes to fake tan company Tanning Vegas and they are attempting to move the case from Nevada to California to force her to settle the bill. ... more

Robert De Niro glad he didn't finish school

Robert De Niro glad he didnt finish school
Robert De Niro jokingly claimed not graduating from high school was an 'advantage' as he picked up an honorary doctorate yesterday (27.05.12). ... more

Beyonce Knowles plans to get 'chocolate wasted'

Beyonce Knowles plans to get chocolate wasted
Beyonce wants to ditch her diet and get 'chocolate wasted' after successfully shedding her baby weight. ... more

Cynthia Nixon marries

Cynthia Nixon marries
Cynthia Nixon married her long-term partner Christine Marinoni in New York yesterday (2y7.05.12), her publicist has confirmed. ... more

Justin Bieber accused of assault

Justin Bieber accused of assault
Justin Bieber has been accused of assaulting a photographer in California after a physical altercation allegedly broke out when the paparazzo attempted to take pictures of the singer and his girlfriend Selena Gomez. ... more

Britney Spears' fiance makes romantic video for her

Britney Spears fiance makes romantic video for her
Britney Spears' fiancee Jason Trawick made a gushing video to tell the singer how proud he is of her US 'X Factor' debut in Austin, Texas, last week. ... more