Judge rejects former CIA agent's lawsuit against Cheney, others

Rick ReynoldsJul 20th, 2007 - 06:30:01

How was what they did 'rebutting public criticism, such as that levied by Mr Wilson'? Does anyone know anything about the judge? Sounds like he may owe his job to I can only guess who.

Report this comment

danJul 20th, 2007 - 11:11:01

how convenient

Report this comment

AustinAngelaJul 20th, 2007 - 12:34:29

Convenient indeed. But don't say that our government isn't the most corrupt in the world. It isn't. Or at least that's what they're telling us to believe, so it MUST be true, right?

Report this comment

SP4; Think...Jul 20th, 2007 - 13:05:00

...'separation of powers'

Now, maybe, agent 86 and 99 will find something else to do...perhaps Joe Wilson can disguise himself as a fire hydrant or something...

Report this comment

ShadowJul 20th, 2007 - 13:25:25

Not good for the agency!
The reasoning by the judge is akin to 'Well, they have to drive a car to go to work, so it's understandable that they accidentally shot someone along the way'...

Report this comment

rootJul 20th, 2007 - 13:30:20

Hey,
If you don't like it - get the hell out. Tired of hearing your whining!

Report this comment

SP4: except for the glaring fact that...Jul 20th, 2007 - 13:55:17

...the white house aka Scoot, never actually shot anyone. Wilson and Plame are posers.

Report this comment

Dave ThomasJul 20th, 2007 - 14:50:29

More bogus mania by another anti-Bush ranter gets thrown out by the legal system. First there was the White House energy council, Valerie 'I wasn't a covert agent after my own husband outed me trying to help the Democrats' Plame, and the constant rantings by Democratic lunatics that terrorists in Guantanamo have more rights and should be allowed out to kill people.

Now the target will become the courts who have to be wrong because they don't agree with the lunatic Democrats who don't care at all about what happens to the United States just as long as they have the power to raise taxes and give away the money to their supporters.

EAT IT DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report this comment

Get over it peopleJul 20th, 2007 - 16:49:49

There was never a crime--she was a CIA desk jockey--nothing more--he was her sugerdaddy left leaning weenie--that used her influence to get the job so he could attack a sitting President.--She gets early retirement with full pay by raising all this hell, so never has to work again.
This was what thet did get
1)A political jab at the Whitehouse that let them attack the pres. and then attack scot.(real target the VP)

2) he gets a nice appointment and paycheck because of her

3)She gets early retirement, and pay for life

4) They almost got away with this suit for even more free money

5) Would really like to know is any unusual deposits were made into their accounts after this occured, or just before--think about it

Report this comment

huh?Jul 20th, 2007 - 16:50:00

My government is so embarrassing sometimes. They could have put dozens of people's lives at risk by leaking her undercover status (not to mention her life was in danger as well) Howcome the people responsible are immune? Oh, that's right, Bush is still in charge.

Report this comment

Don't pretend to be meJul 20th, 2007 - 16:57:37

I am the true Huh--and I don't agree with the above imposter

Report this comment

jillie beanJul 20th, 2007 - 21:47:17

They sell copyrights to our pet names we give ourselves on this site? I thought that 'poster' made an excellent point.

Report this comment