US News
Republican Romney cried when he learned Blacks could be priests
By M&C US News Dec 16, 2007, 17:56 GMT

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney arrives prior to the Des Moines Register/Iowa Public Television Republican presidential debate in Johnston, Iowa, USA, 12 December 2007. The first political test of the 2008 will be the Iowa caucus on 03 January 2008. EPA/STEVE POPE / POOL
Will the U.S. race for the president ever divorce itself from talk of dogma, faith and stripe of religion? Not anytime soon if the latest interview with GOP candidate Mitt Romney shows the mainstream media's fixation on the personal subject.
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” today that he "wept with relief" when the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints announced a 1978 revelation that the priesthood would no longer be denied to black people.
Romney's eyes glistened with tears as he discussed the subject during an appearance.
“I was anxious to see a change in my church,” said the Republican presidential candidate, on for the full hour.
“I can remember when I heard about the change being made. I was driving home from — I think it was law school, but I was driving home — going through the Fresh Pond rotary in Cambridge, Massachusetts. I heard it on the radio and I pulled over and literally wept.
“Even to this day, it’s emotional,” Romney added.
“And so it’s very deep and fundamental in my life and my most core beliefs that all people are children of God. My faith has always told me that. My faith has also always told me that in the eyes of God, every individual was merited the fullest degree of happiness in the hereafter and I had no question that African Americans and blacks generally would have every right and every benefit in the hereafter that anyone else had and that God is no respecter of persons.”
Host Tim Russert asked if “it was wrong for your faith to exclude them for as long as it did.”
“I told you exactly where I stand,” Romney said. “My view is that there’s no discrimination in the eyes of God. And I could not have been more pleased than to see the change that occurred.”
This was Romney’s first appearance on “Meet the Press” where he also discussed his radically altered views on abortion, immigration and defended continued charges of flip-flopping by all of his rivals.
The subject of Romney's "fees" raised when he was Massachusetts governor and the semantics of fees versus taxes were also discussed.
“These were not broad-based fees,” Romney said. “If they are broad-based, they have a sense — a feeling like a tax. A fee is different than a tax in that it is for a purpose. We had fees that hadn’t been changed for decades.”
Romney said former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who has passed him in many polls in the GOP presidential race, should apologize for his statement in Foreign Affairs magazine that the Bush administration has an “arrogant bunker mentality.”
“That’s an insult to the president, and Mike Huckabee should apologize to the president,” Romney said.
Russert hit Romney with a greatest hits of pre-conservative Romneyisms, videotape showing a string of flips in policy stances, but Romney countered with his usual answer to that very question.
“Tim, if you’re looking for someone who’s never changed any position on any policy, then I’m not your guy,” Romney said. “I do learn from experience. If you want someone who doesn’t learn from experience, who stubbornly takes a position on a particular act and says, ‘Well, I’m never changing my view based on what I’ve learned,’ that doesn’t make sense to me.”
Regarding his flip-flop on abortion rights from the time he was running for office in Massachusetts, Romney said he thinks “almost everyone in this nation” opposes abortion.
“I was always personally opposed to abortion, as I think almost everyone in this nation is,” he said, adding that the question for him was “the role of government.”
Romney said he hopes the U.S. ultimately bans abortion.
On stem cell research, he follows President George Bush's lead and would continue in that path.
And illegal immigrants? “They should go home eventually.”
Eventually?
Romney would favor substantial fines to companies who hire illegals and “potentially worse if they were egregious ... offenders.”
And gun control? “I don’t line up 100 percent with the NRA,” he said. “I don’t see eye to eye with the NRA on every issue.”
Romney referred to a Mormon view that evangelical Christians are cool to them in part for competitive reasons. Both camps fight for inductees, to bolster their power by numbers, and keep their coffers flowing.
On organized religion as big business and as a special interest group: “Well, you know, religions are in a competitive battle — they’re competing for souls and adherents,” he said. Later, he repeated: “As I indicated, there are competing faiths in this nation.”
Romney added that he was “delighted” to have the support of Jones. “The great thing, of course, is that our values are the same,” Romney added. “We have Christians and Jews, for instance. They don’t have the same faith, but we certainly have the same Judeo-Christian foundation.”
Asked about the statement in his recent speech that “freedom requires religion,” Romney elaborated: “Long-term, for America to remain a great nation, to lead the world, we must have a recognition of our religious faith. Now that’s, of course, not a particular denomination.”
Russert asked, “Can you be a moral person and be an atheist?”
Romney replied, “Oh, of course. Of course.”
Romney pledged he would have “no litmus test” about faith for nominees to the Supreme Court, or for such jobs as Secretary of Education.
COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in US
- 1. Mitt Romney Addresses Tea Party Summit Pictures
- 2. Seven injured as US Navy plane crashes into apartments
- 3. At least three injured in US Navy plane crash
- 4. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, others to face death penalty trial
- 5. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, four others to face death penalty trial
Older Talkback
page: 1
Sycophantic odes to Ron Paul?
His campaign is newsworthy, as was H. Ross Perot's attempt to defy the two party lock down in American politics.
We follow all the newsworthy political candidates, including the ones the mainstream media would like to overlook.
We aren't endorsing anyone, but following what the candidates say, and what their public records reveal. We are interested in eliciting your opinions on all the candidates.
There is room for plenty of dissension of opinion, not everyone in the United States is of the mindset that matters of a candidates faith trumps workable solutions to the enormous problems we all face as citizens.
No one fauts you for reporting the news. We do, however fault you for being biased. The thing is, like Bernie Goldberg says in his book (titled 'Bias') is that you are unaware of your biases.
Every one of your Ron Paul stories is fluff. The bias is so thick you can walk on it. You'd think this guy was jesus christ, the way you guys slober over him, never mind the fact that it is DEMOCRATS who love this guy most.
One other thing: you should replace the articles in less than 28 days, and quit picking on celebrities you hate. I have never seen such lazy reporters.
'His campaign is newsworthy, as was H. Ross Perot's attempt to defy the two party lock down in American politics.'
Newsflash: He is running as a republican, one of the 2 parties. So yes, sycophantic odes to a fringe candidate. When is the last time you gushed about someone like Duncan Hunter? You do not.
'There is room for plenty of dissension of opinion, not everyone in the United States is of the mindset that matters of a candidates faith trumps workable solutions to the enormous problems we all face as citizens.'
'Dissenting opinions' are fine, great in fact, you are however distorting them.
'Republican Romney cried when he learned Blacks could be priests'
Means to the average reader that Romney so objected to blacks becoming priests that he burst in to tears. It is NOT a title that goes with the text of the story, it signifies the opposite of what the story intended to convey to the reader and that is something that monsters and critics does repeatedly.
' not everyone in the United States is of the mindset that matters of a candidates faith trumps workable solutions to the enormous problems we all face as citizens.'
Since the whole story was about his faith that doesn't follow. I would be very happy to hear the end of all references to 'faith' in this campaign. M&C brought it up, distorted the message and now you are displaying the underline assumptions which were behind you editorializing through title in the first place.
A complete and total difference between what the headline leads you to believe and the article - an injustice to Mitt!!!! Disgusting!!
I don't support Romney (except maybe as a running mate), but thanks to the contrast between the sleazy tabloid style headline and the facts detailed in the article, this is first time of mine visiting this site will also be my last.
Anybody here ever see the youtube video of Romney's racial slurs?
I just looked back at the news index for the last month-I wouldn't accuse M&C of being a Paul biased -I read the past posted articles-all completely fact based. More articles on Huckabee than anyone else here.
Romney supporters are thin skinned about his mormonism and his record apparently.
besides, it smacks of pure B.S. Does he really expect us to believe he shed a tear over THIS? It's unfortunate he has to sink to this.
page: 1


Not even a Romney supporter.Dec 16th, 2007 - 18:48:32
This is despicable. There is a world of difference between:
'Latter-Day Republican Romney cried when he learned Blacks could be priests'
and
'he 'wept with relief' when the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints announced a 1978 revelation that the priesthood would no longer be denied to black people.'
WHOMEVER WRITES YOUR TITLES IS A BIASED LIAR Monsters and Critics. Why not run another one of your sycophantic odes to Ron Paul now to further diminish your almost non-existent credibility.
Report this comment