US News
PREVIEW: Obama, Clinton take centre stage in Potomac primary
Feb 11, 2008, 3:58 GMT
Alexandria, Virginia - The neck-and-neck battle between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination has taken hold of the United States capital region along the Potomac river.
Tuesday's so-called Potomac primary - which includes Virginia, Maryland and Washington - comes as centre-left Democrats nationwide increasingly weigh which prospective presidential nominee has the best chance to defeat Senator John McCain, who is nearly certain to lead the Republican Party into the November general elections.
Obama told supporters Sunday at a rally in northern Virginia that his campaign for 'change' and a new kind of politics attracts independent voters and even some Republicans, while Clinton's more partisan history - already as first lady during Bill Clinton's presidency - not only made her a riskier candidate but would prevent her from implementing Democratic policies as president.
'It's very hard for Senator Clinton to break out of the politics of the last 15 years,' Obama said at a high school gym in Alexandria, Virginia.
'And even if you win, you don't have a working majority for change. ... Senator Clinton starts off with 47 per cent of the country against her. That's a hard place to start if you want to win the White House.'
Clinton, who hopes to become the first woman president, argues that her experience and ability to withstand the attacks of Republicans over the years make her the best candidate against McCain.
Obama spoke and took questions during 90 minutes with an electrified crowd of more than 2,000 people Sunday afternoon in Alexandria, Virginia, within sight of Washington's landmarks just across the Potomac. He headed off for a later campaign stop in south- eastern Virginia and planned Monday rallies at the University of Maryland and in Baltimore, Maryland's largest city.
Clinton made her first campaign trip to the region Thursday and returned for her own round of rallies in southern Virginia over the weekend and on Monday in Maryland. She also drafted in her husband Bill to offer support in the contest.
Obama, vying to become the first African-American president, holds a clear edge in all three primaries according to the latest polls. His momentum was further fueled by a sweep of four states from coast to coast - Louisiana, Nebraska, Washington state and Maine - that held contests over the weekend.
In a surprise move Sunday, Clinton announced that her campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle was to be replaced by a senior advisor, Maggie Williams. Clinton's campaign insisted that the move was not a major shake-up.
Her supporters had already acknowledged last week that all the contests on February's schedule could potentially go to Obama. Clinton is hoping to make her next stand on March 4 in the Texas and Ohio primaries.
With neither side giving up much ground, the tight race nationwide has aroused strong passions on both sides and left some worried that party unity could become strained.
'This could be protracted. It could get ugly,' said Bruce Danver, a 48-year-old engineer who attended Obama's rally.
Danver said that he would support either Democrat in the general election but worried that Clinton provokes a more 'visceral reaction' among her detractors.
Both candidates have sought to keep their talk positive, after a racially tinged spat last month ahead of the South Carolina primary. Even with a large African-American populations voting Tuesday, race has not been a public issue this week, but it still lies below the surface.
That hasn't stopped the political jousting from spilling onto the streets of the nation's capital. One Clinton supporter, Richelle Harrison, an African-American woman in her 40s, stood with a 'Hillary' sign at a busy subway station last week near the White House.
A middle-age man, also African-American, walked past carrying a computer case over his shoulder, and yelled: 'Obama for Change! Hillary is just Bill's ticket back to the White House.'
Harrison, a webcasting technology specialist, said it was a typical reaction.
'As an African-American, my family and friends have been saying, 'How can you do this? You should be on Obama's side',' she said. 'But I truly believe she is the best candidate. I hear what (Obama) says, and I don't believe he's ready to be president.'
Obama, who was only elected to the US Senate in 2004, quipped at Sunday's rally that any more time spent stewing in Washington would 'boil the hope out' of him - an argument that has resonated among his own supporters.
'I think he's down to earth,' said teacher Amy Roberts, 34, of Alexandria. 'I actually believe him.'
On the Republican side, McCain holds a commanding lead in delegates to the Republican National Convention in September but is still seeking to lock up the nomination. Recent polls give him strong leads in Virginia and Maryland over his only remaining rival, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee.
COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in US
- 1. Mitt Romney Addresses Tea Party Summit Pictures
- 2. Seven injured as US Navy plane crashes into apartments
- 3. At least three injured in US Navy plane crash
- 4. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, others to face death penalty trial
- 5. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, four others to face death penalty trial
Older Talkback
page: 1
...Lincoln also ramrodded the Emancipation. Discerning motives is a full time job for historians. Consider Bush:
Did Bush mislead congress on Iraq i.e. WMD's.
...or did Congress manipulate Bush on Iraq i.e. 'he'll get Saddam for us...and then we can hang him'?
Now, if you believe Bush mislead congress, it requires you to come to the conclusion that they were ALL, dems and republicans, fools.
If, however, you believe that Congress manipulated Bush, it requires you to believe that ALL of Bush's people were fooled.
Think about that, professor, and, by all means, get back to us!
page: 1


PatriotFeb 11th, 2008 - 17:30:22
As an example of truth: President Lincoln was not in favor of the freedom of slaves, thus his first speech:
Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States, that by the accession of a Republican Administration, their property, and their peace, and personal security, are to be endangered. There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension. Indeed, the most ample evidence to the contrary has all the while existed, and been open to their inspection. It is found in nearly all the published speeches of him who now addresses you. I do but quote from one of those speeches when I declare that 'I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.' Those who nominated and elected me did so with full knowledge that I had made this, and many similar declarations, and had never recanted them. And more than this, they placed in the platform, for my acceptance, and as a law to themselves, and to me, the clear and emphatic resolution which I now read:
Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to that balance of power on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depend; and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any State or Territory, no matter what pretext, as among the gravest of crimes.'
His second speech still did not include the saving of slaves, thus another american slip of the tongue. Lincoln was not a great president, he was like all the others, but not quite, thus he was shot!
The American Republic will not be sold or bartered for the People.
Report this comment