US News
US Senate approves terror surveillance overhaul
Jul 9, 2008, 22:32 GMT
Washington - The US Senate on Wednesday passed a long- awaited bill that places fresh restrictions on a government eavesdropping programme which has been significantly expanded after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The legislation, thrashed out between Republicans, Democrats and the White House after a year of wrangling, allows the intelligence community to acquire broad warrants to listen in on calls between Americans and suspected terrorists outside of the country.
President George W Bush called the compromise a 'vital piece of legislation ... critical to America's safety' and lauded both parties for finding common ground in an election year. The president had long argued that the surveillance programme is crucial to preventing future terrorist attacks against the United States.
A bitter debate has simmered for years over the proper balance between national security and civil liberties, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) immediately announced that it would challenge the new measure in US courts.
The Senate adopted the compromise bill 69-28 after the House of Representatives approved similar legislation last month. Bush said he would soon sign the bill into law.
The revised Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act broadens congressional oversight of the programme and effectively reestablishes the primacy of a special court designed to approve all government requests to listen in on telephone calls or emails collected in the United States.
The non-public FISA court, set up in 1978 to allow the government to produce classified information, had been largely bypassed by the Bush administration since the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington.
But opponents said the compromise bill still allows warrantless surveillance of Americans if the information is collected overseas instead of in the US, and did not contain enough safeguards and oversight to prevent abuse of the system.
It also controversially grants immunity from lawsuits to telecommunications companies that provided information without warrants to the Bush administration in the years after September 11.
Bush's warrantless surveillance programme was first revealed by media organizations in 2005, and about 40 lawsuits against telecoms firms are now pending in US courts. Many Democrats in the Senate strongly opposed blocking those cases from proceeding.
'Now is not the time to close the courthouse doors on this issue,' Democratic Senator Christopher Dodd, a leading opponent of the bill, said in debate. 'My trust remains in the courts.'
Republicans argued that telecoms firms should not be subjected to civil suits for helping to protect national security. The bill would still allow the surveillance programme itself - and government officials who crafted it - to be brought before the courts.
The ACLU, in announcing its court challenge, called the bill a 'blatant assault on civil liberties and the right to privacy.'
The issue has become a hot topic on the election campaign trail. Democratic candidate Barack Obama faced a backlash from supporters last month for saying he approved of the compromise bill - an about- face from an earlier promise that he would oppose any legislation that provided immunity to telecommunications companies.
Republican rival John McCain has strongly supported the surveillance programme and immunity for telecoms.
Senators Obama and McCain both voted in favour of the Senate bill on Wednesday.

COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in US
- 1. Mitt Romney Addresses Tea Party Summit Pictures
- 2. Seven injured as US Navy plane crashes into apartments
- 3. At least three injured in US Navy plane crash
- 4. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, others to face death penalty trial
- 5. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, four others to face death penalty trial
Older Talkback
page: 1
which plante you're from, SP4. You've got to be an alien, no normal human being could ever come up with the crap you do.
I thought it funny that on hardball last night, the liberal pundit panel was defending obama's shift on fisa as something necessary and 'presidential.'
That's crazy. Bush is an evil stupid baby killer bent on destruction of everything we hold dear under attack 24x7x365x8 on cable news - - but when obama supports the same policy - he is lauded as being presidential.
What a tragic farce.
Limbaugh, for all his stale commentary, was correct:
these senators are able to get away with this when they represent the stupidest constituancies in America back home, but now he's trotted out onto National stage and it's adult swim, with no place to hide.
While he was sleeping, Bush puts one right up his ass and now he wants some wag of his to pull it out of his half-white ass. Good luck.
Obama wants to to what Kerry tried i.e. voting against it and then voting for it....or vice versa...that's the problem with not having any real beliefs...it gets so confusing as to what you tell the public....just ask Hillary.
To the Dildo above Charles...I think the word you're looking for is 'planet' but it's so hard to tell with morons...
ever hear of a typographical error, crap-for-brains? That is what happened. It is a far, far different thing than the drug addled brain-farts you produce. By the way, which planet are you from? Did you just pop out from Uranus?
page: 1

SP4: another Bush win for common senseJul 9th, 2008 - 23:04:26
In an age where politicians think the Constitution is a suicide pact, Bush the moderate clears another contentious bill through a democratic congress by appealing to the moderates.
Just another case of the guy liberals called a loser, who just keeps on winning, with a whopping 30% approval rating.
Report this comment