US News
PREVIEW: Abortion, gay marriage, animal rights on US ballot bids
By Andy Goldberg Oct 28, 2008, 7:59 GMT
On the Web
Similar articles
- Obama's historic election was landmark for race relations (Feature)
- Obama victory helps turn page on US racial history (Feature)
- Obama seeks expanded civilian role as counter to strained military
- US presidential hopefuls share genes with Winston, Angelina
- Clinton supporter steps down over racial remarks
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. Whitney Houston to be buried Saturday in small family funeral
- 2. Obama, Democrats get Republican raspberries for Valentine's Day
- 3. Obama calls for quick passage of payroll tax holiday extension
- 4. Report: Director Oliver Stone's son converts to Islam
- 5. US Supreme Court justice robbed at machete-point
Older Talkback
page: 1
WOW Redistribution of Wealth From OBAMA's OWN Mouth
This is a major find. This is from Drudge, a Radio interview with Senator Obama where he mourns the fact that the Warren Court Never forced REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH. Partial transcript and Audio Below:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
Speaking on a call-in radio show in 2001, you can hear Senator Obama say things that should profoundly shock any American — or at least those who have not taken the time to dig deeply enough into this man’s beliefs and affiliations.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
Barack Obama:
You know, if you look at the victories and failures of the civil-rights movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it, I’d be okay, but the Supreme Court never entered into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.
And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution — at least as it’s been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted it in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: [It] says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted, and one of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil-rights movement was because the civil-rights movement became so court-focused, uh, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change. And in some ways we still suffer from that.
In Obama’s America, we’ll finally be able to break free of the “constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution” — and in so doing, achieve “social justice” through “redistributive change.”
..as if we did not spot this before.
page: 1
Your Talkback on this Story