US News
US Supreme Court denies criminals the right to DNA appeal
Jun 18, 2009, 19:04 GMT
On the Web
Similar articles
- Death sentences remain at three-decade low in US
- Russian arms dealer pleads not guilty in US court (Roundup)
- US: Russian arms dealer now a "federal inmate"
- ANALYSIS: US gun rights far from resolved after Supreme Court ruling
- Supreme Court rejects city gun ban, upholds gun rights (2nd Roundup)
Latest Headlines in US
- 1. PREVIEW: Stars, fans and cameras set for Whitney Houston's funeral
- 2. Hollywood's sad story: Stars ruined by prescription drugs
- 3. Actress Susan Sarandon funds table tennis for New York schools
- 4. Romney lags behind a surging Santorum in US polls
- 5. Whitney Houston to be buried Saturday in small family funeral
Older Talkback
page: 1
A letter from the lab came with the mail stating there was a 99,98 percent of probability that I was SP4 's dad .The horror...
...after all, look at the cocks--ker everyone thinks I am...then again, I suspect you are younger, and they just read the results backwards....after all, I hear those mom's of yours really lay a LOT of pipe!
There SP goes again with his Mom fixation..... I think every prisoner should have access to DNA testing if there are good enough reasons for it.
Except for SP. they should just stick the needle in his arse and be done with him.
..was that at least five of the judges have brains enough to realize it is, properly, the purvue of the state that tried these folks to administer the law. I also suspect a stong predilection for those same judges to foil an attempt to have every scumbag in the system foist every request before them, stacking up the courts for years. The fact is, once you can prove that a test WOULD inroduce NEW evidence the courts are compelled to consider it, and the part I like is that it works BOTH ways.
do f*ck off. You turn is coming as a nice white b*tch for some BIG dark skinned due in Cell Block D
...poor baby above can't contol his libnazi rage...funny eh?.. all I have to do is tickle him a bit and it just FLOWS forth! Fortunately, none of that still makes me wrong.
Now run along and inform yourself. I do think that is a stretch, but my weakness is believing in the Internet generation.
'was that at least five of the judges have brains enough to realize it is, properly, the purvue of the state that tried these folks to administer the law. I also suspect a stong predilection for those same judges to foil an attempt to have every scumbag in the system foist every request before them, stacking up the courts for years. The fact is, once you can prove that a test WOULD inroduce NEW evidence the courts are compelled to consider it, and the part I like is that it works BOTH ways.'
God you are stupid. Please learn how to put paragraph(s) together and learn to spell. Your idiotic statements would be hard enough to take if the were readable, but at least you would be able to try and make a valid point! Why do you have to appear so stupid.
The cry should be for equal justice throughout the land. In this respect, the Supreme Court decision is a flawed decision.
..do you actually have a differnet opinion?
Please opine!
None of my comments make me wrong,(and it seems that five judges agree!) but feel free to point them out. Afterwards, if your prose stands inspection, we might all then agree I'm stupid, or remove any lingering doubts that you are the pointless boob we presently know. Personally, I'm going with the latter, but I still have the weakness in believing in people.
page: 1
Your Talkback on this Story